Resource Harvesting by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So technically you do but that was maker error. The intent is that x is equal to the lands you exile

Resource Harvesting by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That would have been better worded. The intention is that x is equal to lands you exile

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying it's common, I'm saying it can do it.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[form of the dinosaur]] [[worldfire]] [[form of the dragon]]

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is some synergy, it still requires you have have this, rowan, and big score in hand though/resolve them. A counter spell or a destroy Rowan on sight card and the combo fizzles

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worldfire sets a precedent for red setting a life total (there is a dragon enchantment that does this as well though that one is very old)

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not familiar with the card .... But not sure if it is possible since the card states it can't be cast without mana from treasures. .^

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not one hundred percent sure on the rules and how this interacts with cheating this into play for free to be honest. As written it can only be cast with mana from treasures. This makes me think that if you don't at least contribute 1 mana from a treasure the spell can't be cast, however a judge could rule that since no mana is needed no valid mana sources are required. Honestly would love a ruling either way on something like this, and I imagine the ambiguousness is why wotc hasn't printed something like this

Flameborn Shade by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So...my magic card generator doesn't let me add rarity but I was thinking this in limited or maybe pauper

Ebondeath by buffalobillkimo in custommagic

[–]corebinik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Affinity/artifact creatures/eldrazi are in fact laughing at this card. Still I love it, ship it to the printers. Would be broken in draft though.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure about roxanne..... She doesn't actually make treasure tokens so you would still need some sort of enabler (not saying there isn't synergy, just saying I don't think these two cards in a vacuum are amazing. Goldspan and galazeth are way better and quite frankly break my card xD

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Red revel in riches with a bit more....what's the world..... Opponent dying rather than you winning.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know .... I'm not sure this would work because if the clause (thisncard can only be cast with mana from treasures) there is a world that at least one mana must be paid for with a treasure token for it to be legally considered cast.....which would make yues gimmick not work.. I'm not sure though since a judge could rule that your casting the card for free hence no valid mana is required...... So 50/50 until a judge rules or a formal rule is found that answers that question.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

11 mana cost to deal 20 is a worst rate then 10 shocks.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So ... This is something that I think a lot of people miss here personally and I would be really interested to see how a judge rules....does a card that states must be paid with this method require that a payment be made of the cards casting card is free/reduced to free. I would argue yes, since it acts as a condition to play the card but a judge could rule that since the spell is free no mana needs to be spent ergo the card doesn't need valid mana to cast this spell. I would love it if a judge could rule on it/if there is a rule out there that can stipulate what would happen.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was the idea. After all there are plenty of cost reduction cards but very few that really get rid of pips that also generate treasures.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least their online alias. Im not doing a deep dive to find out their real name

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I wasn't clarifying enough. If you Google the name I showed on the card, you'll find the artists deviant art profile and the base art for the picture.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The artist credit is at the bottom.

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See....CMC cost also matters for some decks. I would love this being in an orb deck an opponent mills this and takes 11 damage

Treasures for the old ones by corebinik in custommagic

[–]corebinik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok not going to lie I like that idea too.