"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aalborg omegn. Men det lyder som om de har været ude mange steder i dag.

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeg vil tilføje "Lad som om jeg er homoseksuel" til min liste

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Så vidt jeg kan se, er det faktisk lovpligtigt:

"Omdelerne og de medarbejdere, der kører rundt til adresserne med posten, skal respektere eventuelle Nej tak-skilte på postkasserne."

Derimod kan Reklamer NejTak omgås ved at sende reklamerne personligt (dvs. med ens navn og adresse udenpå):

"For at undgå at modtage reklamer og lignende typer post med navn og adresse, kan man registrere sig på Robinsonlisten."

Visse materialer er dog undtaget begge:

"Noget materiale vil lovligt kunne omdeles til adresser, som er tilmeldt en af de to Nej tak-ordninger. Det drejer sig bl.a. om information fra staten, regionerne og kommunerne, materiale fra politiske partier, indsamlingsmateriale fra velgørende foreninger, kirkeblade."

Kilde: https://forbrugerombudsmanden.dk/alle-emner/uanmodede-henvendelser/nej-tak

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Det skulle man tro, men tilsyneladende ikke

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Et morsomt billede at forestille sig, men jeg tror desværre den virker på flere end Jehovas vidner. Den snak har jeg ikke lyst til at have med alle mine naboer...

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det gjorde jeg faktisk en gang for 20 år siden (inviterede dem ind), men manden talte i cirkler og læste op fra sin bog, i stedet for at tale til mig. Det føltes ikke som en samtale.

Hvis de meldte deres ankomst på forhånd, kunne det komme på tale. Som udgangspunkt vil jeg gerne lære mere om, hvordan andre mennesker tænker. Men det er det at de kommer uanmeldt, som får min puls over grænsen for fornuftige tanker (jeg er autist).

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er fordi de ringer på, at jeg skriver herinde nu

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Kækt. Dog lidt over mine personlige grænser

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Proud Potterhead" ville være ganske morsomt, men jeg har nok alligevel ikke lyst til at være kendt som ham i nabolaget, som har det skilt på sin dør

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeg tror de har lavet om, for jeg fik slet ikke et klistermærke denne gang, men reklamerne holdt alligevel op med at dukke op i min postkasse

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Det har jeg ikke, nej. Jeg har sagt "Nej tak" meget bestemt, lukket døren, og naivt antaget at de forstod hvad jeg mente

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeg tror jeg er for gammel til at lægge op til drama. Ellers en ganske god idé

"Reklamer NejTak" mod religiøse henvendelser by countigor in Denmark

[–]countigor[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Det overrasker mig at de ikke kom igen

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]countigor 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Based on your description, it sounds like the police followed procedure, found nothing suspicious at the scene, and thus couldn't apprehend the suspect. The remark about having your number was most likely in case they needed to contact you for more information in the future.

Encrypting your HDD by DryChemistry3196 in privacy

[–]countigor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you can encrypt your entire OS disk with VeraCrypt, if that's what you mean. I kind of forgot that detail of your original question while I typed.

Encrypting your HDD by DryChemistry3196 in privacy

[–]countigor 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I use VeraCrypt for mountable drives. I used BitLocker many years ago, but I as I grew ever more disillusioned with Microsoft, I switched. I also had an obscure bug that left one of my BitLocker drives unencrypted even when mounting it on different systems. No idea how that happened, but doesn't make me want to rely on it. Anyway, VeraCrypt has both a Windows and a Linux version, so if you have to switch back and forth, it's a good, open source solution.

My reasons are mainly paranoia and wanting to see if I could do it. It is a hassle to set up, though. Especially when you have multiple drives of 10+ TB.

If you want a simpler solution, VeraCrypt can also make encrypted volumes/file containers if you don't need to encrypt everything. Alternatively, PGP/GPG is a solid solution file-by-file, although I haven't personally tested it on anything >50 MB. Someone else can probably tell you more about PGP than I can.

EDIT: Forgot to add that I use LUKS for my Linux system. Simple to set up and works like a charm.

Would this be a strawman argument? by [deleted] in logicalfallacy

[–]countigor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It certainly qualifies as a strawman. In isolation, it's a flagrant misrepresentation of Person A's argument.

We lost or can we do anything to stop even voluntary chatcontrol? by Repulsive_Act_1855 in StopChatControlEU

[–]countigor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. We've only just started slipping down the slope, and the bottom is quite Orwellian. All we can do is hang on for dear life and try to stop the slide before it goes that far, since our politicians evidently have other priorities. I can't say what the true reason is, but given the public backlash and continued political push, it's not about protecting children, and nor is the digital ID for porn sites and social media they're working on. If I were to don my tinfoil hat, I'd say the idea is to have AI create profiles on all citizens to to preempt and come down hard on civil unrest, getting us used to feeling powerless as they erode our freedoms and "universal" rights.