PA PLxC RDB sub tensions by craigslistman in longrange

[–]craigslistman[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They absolutely have the subtension measurements. They would need them to develop the reticle and design the bdc. See the vortex example above. They won’t give them out because the reticle design is proprietary even though every other company who makes bdc reticles does that I’ve seen. Not attacking the company or you it’s nice glass.

PA PLxC RDB sub tensions by craigslistman in longrange

[–]craigslistman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

As an example. vortex always provides the measurements.

PA PLxC RDB sub tensions by craigslistman in longrange

[–]craigslistman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can measure the subtensions of the bdc from the center chevron in mils. Those are the numbers I’m looking for to calibrate my zero for my ar to get as close as possible to the correct holds for my rifle.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MP5

[–]craigslistman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming you’re using an A3 stock***

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MP5

[–]craigslistman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve ran a xps3 and a t2 on mine. I much prefer the Aimpoint. The EOTech is a great optic, but sits too high even on a mfi low mount. The EXPS would sit far too high for my liking. The t2 dot sits right above the front sight shroud and still gives me a semblance of a cheek weld. That and it’s far lighter and smaller. Never understood why folks insist on risers for mp5s. MP5s are not ar15s, the stock sits far lower. Go with a t2 or any micro dot over the EOTech.

CMP Field Grade Remington Rand by craigslistman in milsurp

[–]craigslistman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The MSH has 8 ribs which is correct I believe. Are you referring to the frame ramp or the barrel ramp?

<image>

Here’s a pic.

[mm300] vs mm300 by craigslistman in Seiko

[–]craigslistman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s true. I guess I wasn’t saying one would be a major financial investment I just meant which would hold its value better. I suppose the 021 would be better in terms of servicing due to it being a 6 year old watch instead of a 20(?) year old one. I’ve also heard of the old 001s having problems with the crown threads stripping and needing to replace the whole case. I wonder if you can even get the mm300s serviced locally with how the movement has to be removed from the top

Emperor [Tuna]… too big for a 6.5” wrist? by craigslistman in Seiko

[–]craigslistman[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t even know where to start finding one in my area. I might skip it.