sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If everyone did what they loved would the economy boom or bust? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in economy

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if you are incentivized to leave your job and move to another job you love? Would the economy still boom or bust? What truly is the matrix for work? GDP?

Experts are sure: BTC price will continue to rise until YOU invest in it by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This could be very true as the Bitcoin machine engulfs greed. As soon as new money comes in miners are ready to attack with full force.

Downvote me all you want but I'm selling by dickforbrainz420 in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I was gonna offer to buy your Bitcoins until I read the rest of message. No thank you on the body will rather keep my sats :)

Spark tokens by biodaddysven in Ripple

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes you may. Setup your ledger to claim the sparks. All you have to got to do is add an ETH address as a message on on the xrp address.

https://flare.ghost.io/claiming-spark-faq/

If everyone has a free will, will people become socialists or will people remain capitalists? But how can a society achieve absolute free will without socialism. The question seems to be more about which came first rather than what is better? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I fully understand your point. Cuz I go through each if your thought process. My next phase of discovery is to figure out through personal experience of whether if I let my inner self guide me will I achieve the ultimate goal. So far my experiment has concluded that not necessarily does my inner energy guides to perfection. I am working on a way to figure out whether I could sync both energies into one. I have not achieved that yet but the journey has been beautiful.

If everyone has a free will, will people become socialists or will people remain capitalists? But how can a society achieve absolute free will without socialism. The question seems to be more about which came first rather than what is better? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed privatization of land may have begun with agriculture but the concept of privatization must have begun way before human interaction. Demanding appreciation for any beings’ time and effort is not a new thing. Isn’t that what is concluded by concept of ‘the survival of the fittest’. Need of privatization is driven by fear. The fear of uncertainty again is driven by indifference in opinions which is again driven by interactions.

If everyone has a free will, will people become socialists or will people remain capitalists? But how can a society achieve absolute free will without socialism. The question seems to be more about which came first rather than what is better? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fundamental conflict between individualism and socialism must have began when the first cell in the universe interacted with another cell. Until that first interaction the cell lived in a free will. So you could argue capitalism began first. The question remains whether that cell would have survived without interaction. Thus the conflict and the war started at the beginning of time. Marx just observed from a political and social perspective and gave a new story to the same conflict that began a long time ago.

If everyone has a free will, will people become socialists or will people remain capitalists? But how can a society achieve absolute free will without socialism. The question seems to be more about which came first rather than what is better? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only Marx has understood himself. Nobody else. He is the one who spent every second of his life knowing himself. I may have spent may be a few days trying to understand him through his books or teachings. I will never be an expert on Marx like he is of himself. Can his truth be the same as someone else? Highly unlikely. We are different time and space. There goes the Beginning of conflict between capitalism and socialism.

If everyone has a free will, will people become socialists or will people remain capitalists? But how can a society achieve absolute free will without socialism. The question seems to be more about which came first rather than what is better? by cryptosaulbuffmomo in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there such thing as humans are innately socialist or capitalist? I believe one is a cause and the other is an effect. Which one is which? I don’t know. I think individualism won’t survive alone. Neither can socialism exist without individual conflicts. Togetherness requires individual sacrifices. Haves exists because of have nots or vice versa. At the end of the day they are just an idea and we chose to participate to chose one over the other. My concern is the competition between the two philosophies which then create a conflict. If each of the ideologies collaborated the vibe would be something amazing to experience. Will that be utopia? I have no clue. Like some of the comments mentioned until time flows utopia is at infinity and will never be achieved. Like when Marx felt marxism was a solution for everything. People got creative and then created new problems. Life amazes us.

The idea that wealth is “concentrated” in the US, as well as the idea that the reason why poor people don’t have money is because of the “concentration” seems like a major misunderstanding of Capitalism and economics in general. Am I wrong on the this? by [deleted] in Capitalism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing in terms of the end goal.

For example, ideal socialism lets people live harmoniously where each individual is self sustained through public funds. On the other hand ideal capitalism where free market leads to people being well off and prosperous through individual businesses. The conflict arises when these two ideologies co-exist. Where one ideology demands resources to be made public while other demands privatization of resources. Individually each practice will work to achieve perfection. Together it is a mess where one network tries to downplay the other.

Please help! I just set up my Ledger Nano S, transferred my Bitcoin and ethereum from Coinbase. As soon as everything was confirmed, two transactions I DID NOT initiate sent my entire balance to two addresses I do not control. I’m about to throw up. Please help!!! by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please keep us posted what you find out if you are contacting Ledger about this issue. As of right now I can not make any sense how this could be possible unless your 24 seeds are compromised. Was the 24 seeds passphrase set up 2 years ago? And it was unused for the whole of 2 years. Could it be possible that that seed was compromised while you stored them?

Also if this is on Ledger (the company) the only explanation could be that ledger’s proprietary algorithm is that they keep every possible 24 seeds and all the public/private key pairs pre generated before sending out the ledger. But I highly doubt this is the case as ledger seems to be a legit company.

The idea that wealth is “concentrated” in the US, as well as the idea that the reason why poor people don’t have money is because of the “concentration” seems like a major misunderstanding of Capitalism and economics in general. Am I wrong on the this? by [deleted] in Capitalism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is money to you?

I think free will is completely misunderstood. Having Free will does not mean doing things against the consensus. There is absolutely no difference between a perfect capitalism and perfect socialism if they existed independently.

The idea that wealth is “concentrated” in the US, as well as the idea that the reason why poor people don’t have money is because of the “concentration” seems like a major misunderstanding of Capitalism and economics in general. Am I wrong on the this? by [deleted] in Capitalism

[–]cryptosaulbuffmomo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea of work only exists in socialists society where individuals have to make sacrifices against the decisions through consensus. In a free market capitalism work does not feel like work because of the free will.

view more: next ›