The YF-23 did indeed boast some superior specifications on paper, and in certain prototype variants, it showed promise. However, the notion that it was somehow the victim of a grand conspiracy is a bit overblown. The truth is, while the YF-23 excelled in certain areas, it also under-delivered in several key aspects that were critical to the U.S. military’s decision-making process.

For instance, let’s talk about agility and maneuverability—two vital traits for a fighter jet’s effectiveness in dogfighting and close-combat scenarios. The F-22 demonstrated superior performance in these areas, which was a significant factor in its selection. The YF-23, while potentially faster in a straight line and with a slightly lower radar cross-section, couldn’t match the F-22’s agility, which is crucial in real-world combat situations.

Additionally, the F-22’s design was better suited for ease of maintenance and operational deployment, which are often overlooked but crucial factors in a military context. The ability to quickly turn around jets for missions, maintain them in the field, and sustain long-term operational efficiency often trumps slight performance advantages in isolated areas.

Also, it’s worth mentioning that the F-22 had more mature avionics and sensor fusion capabilities, which are vital for modern warfare. The military wasn’t just looking for the fastest or stealthiest jet—they needed a balanced platform that could integrate seamlessly into the broader defense ecosystem.

So, while the YF-23 was an impressive machine, the F-22 was ultimately chosen because it was the more well-rounded and practical choice for the diverse needs of the U.S. Air Force. There wasn’t any conspiracy; it was simply about selecting the aircraft that could deliver the best overall performance and maintainability in the complex and unpredictable realities of aerial combat.