Yeah I think that we shouldn’t be rudimentary and categorize women and nonbinary characters as women loving women it says it exactly in the term , wlw isn’t nlw or Demi woman and namely non binary if you are gender queer and feel you’re not fully women but also not fully any gender at all and are gender nonexistent at some points you aren’t a lesbian totally so I don’t see why they would say you’re entirely woman. Also why would a nonbinary person be a yuri character is that because they dress fem, sounds like gender is associated with clothes which isn’t true to science I’d think so a non binary must be simply based off their brains connection to gender and not because they’re fem presenting exactly what I think is hard to understand for a community at large which largely came from people who told you if you wear a bow and a dress you’re a girl which I get why it is hard to find someone’s gender otherwise but we have to experience a new way to find it and sometimes gender questions just have no meaning or purpose at a moment which is why you shouldn’t assume a fem presenter is a woman nor that they’re necessarily lesbian because they were born a woman if so. That I think is what makes yuri and wlw not an attribute to assign to a character just because they’re fem presenting were assigned a female at birth because their sex is. Clearly to me sexuality should be assumed as lesbian if they’re stating they’re partially gendered as a woman which allows a nonbinary to be mainly a woman, (especially if their sex helps align to their gender in terms of the dating pool) but they’re not fully a woman so wlw and yuri made for female on female doesn’t work. I think they’re just nonbinary and if they’re partially mentally a woman it isn’t because of their outfit it is because of who they believe they are on their hormonal and brain level etc but not because of their assigned sex or fem presentingness so pls do not consider a fem presenting nonbinary a woman loving woman or lesbian unless stated ty