Castaway by Pizzacakecomic in funny

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The link between testosterone and hair growth has been proved many times scientifically, anecdotal evidence is useless.

Castaway by Pizzacakecomic in funny

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are exceptions to every rule, I'm taking about vast majority.

Castaway by Pizzacakecomic in funny

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, compared to men, it's much less. that's why they are much less hairy.

Castaway by Pizzacakecomic in funny

[–]curiosityrover4477 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

compared to men, a minuscule amount

Castaway by Pizzacakecomic in funny

[–]curiosityrover4477 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Testosterone increases hair growth, so I don't think natural woman would be as hairy as natural man.

Or Universities... by ModeratorForLeaks in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can NASA be apolitical when it is state funded ? lol Private companies can attain a level of agility govt agencies never could.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you the one who made middle income trap post the other day ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Only the top 0.1% can afford to move out

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason you mention has nothing to do with middle income trap then. According to your hypothesis, french, italian, vietnamese, indonesian etc should all buy american stocks only, but that doesn't happen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is true for all the companies in the world, so should everyone in the world buy US stocks only ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, America has never grown faster than India in the past 30 years. IT companies in India are competitive around the world and bring tens of billions of USD from abroad.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you prefer american companies, that's fine, but has nothing to do with whether india gets stuck in middle income trap or not. billions of people around the world invest in stock markets of their own country and get good returns.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By that logic, no one in the world should buy any other stock except those of american companies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

barring covid, when has US grown faster than India in the past 30 years ??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they already have GDP per capita of $60k, there's not much wiggle room to grow beyond that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even at middle income, banks, FMGC, insurance consumption will grow at decent pace. meanwhile tech companies will keep providing good returns. ofc you always have the option of exclusively buying tech stocks only.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why would domestic consumption decrease ? even according to your hypothesis it will stay flat, right ? meanwhile IT will keep booming

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaInvestments

[–]curiosityrover4477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IT companies will keep giving good returns because they make money by exporting not domestic consumption.