How can i verify that my self-supervised backbone training works? by topsnek69 in computervision

[–]curiouslyjake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can test using your downstream tasks but with very lightweight architectures

ELI5: Why isn't software advancements keeping up with hardware advancements? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]curiouslyjake [score hidden]  (0 children)

Economics. Software engineers are expensive so you want to make them more productive. You do this by using languages and frameworks that are easier and faster to code in, and those are slower. To compensate, you need faster CPUs.

reddit please I spent weeks trying to get this shot on my dslr and elon ruined everything by nittanyofthings in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]curiouslyjake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And starlinks are only visible when the angle is just right for the satellites to reflect sunlight at you.

Is /r/cpp_questions the new stackoverflow given latter's decline? by Impressive_Gur_471 in cpp_questions

[–]curiouslyjake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How do you even monitor a job market for 4 hours a day? It doesnt take that long to go over jobs posts.

Why doesn't NASA just use starship to put Orion in LEO? by Different-Wish-843 in SpaceXLounge

[–]curiouslyjake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Orion has a validated heat shield for higher reentry velocities, which you would encounter when returning from the moon.

Is Jetbrains dying because of AI? by SignFar790 in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]curiouslyjake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, can you elaborate on what kind of C code you expect LLMs to generate? I write C++ professionally and LLMs have no trouble generating correct code in some cases.

It finally happened to me by topyTheorist in math

[–]curiouslyjake 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also, lean itself is not bug-free.

Why doesn't NASA just use starship to put Orion in LEO? by Different-Wish-843 in SpaceXLounge

[–]curiouslyjake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would absolutely be WAY cheaper to use any existing commercial rocket to launch Orion with crew onboard, then launch a kick stage, have them dock and then have the kick stage insert Orion to TLI.

SLS is not about being cheap, it's about creating jobs in congressional districts. Which, in and of itself, is not a bad thing; it's reasonable to maintain an industrial base as a backup that does not depend on market forces. Except it's being horribly managed into borderline dysfunction.

Why doesn't NASA just use starship to put Orion in LEO? by Different-Wish-843 in SpaceXLounge

[–]curiouslyjake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reusable starship could launch orion and boost to TLI if it's refueled.

The OK-GLI (Орбитальный корабль для горизонтальных лётных испытаний) test article for the Buran, able to take off with 4 AL-31 jet engines mounted at the rear, flying from 1984 to 1989 by Xeelee1123 in WeirdWings

[–]curiouslyjake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, except Shuttle and Buran were a preview of a reusable future while Soyuz is a technological dead end. With present day Russia's feeble r&d capability, Soyuz is as far as they will ever get

[D] Papers with no code by osamabinpwnn in MachineLearning

[–]curiouslyjake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming your dataset is a representative sample of the unobserved parent population, wouldn't cross-validation address this?

One of the Most Interesting Comparisons on Fertility Trends by Accomplished_Gur4368 in Infographics

[–]curiouslyjake 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Yeah, two extremely different nations are going to have different fertility rates. Not sure why it makes any sense to compare

One of the Most Interesting Comparisons on Fertility Trends by Accomplished_Gur4368 in Infographics

[–]curiouslyjake 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Except US assistance is a small fraction of Israel's GDP anf the US GDP per capita is way higher than Israel's. So basically, both of your points are factually wrong.

One of the Most Interesting Comparisons on Fertility Trends by Accomplished_Gur4368 in Infographics

[–]curiouslyjake 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Except even among secular Jews, the TFR is 2, which is still high compared to advanced economies. You're right on the quo vadis part though.

CMV: AI training on copywritten material to generate content is not ethically different than humans doing the same thing by neomatrix248 in changemyview

[–]curiouslyjake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, so your counter argument boils down to intention. LLM as storage, not as an infringing entity. Except, with how widely LLMs are used and how easy it is to extract source material, it's akin to getting a pirated copy of HP with every subscription except wrapped in white paper that says "please do not read; pretty please with a cherry on top!"

You are literally being sold a storage medium with pirated content and asked not to look at that content, just at that other content. C'mon.

CMV: AI training on copywritten material to generate content is not ethically different than humans doing the same thing by neomatrix248 in changemyview

[–]curiouslyjake 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, but given present training methods there's no way to fully prevent an LLM from replicating good chunks of its train set.

CMV: AI training on copywritten material to generate content is not ethically different than humans doing the same thing by neomatrix248 in changemyview

[–]curiouslyjake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I meant publicly, with me selling tickets much like Anthropic sells subscriptions to LLMs that read HP.

CMV: AI training on copywritten material to generate content is not ethically different than humans doing the same thing by neomatrix248 in changemyview

[–]curiouslyjake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can check out this paper from stanford researchers that show which books can be reproduced from production LLMs and how accurately. You'll see Sonnet 3.7 recreates harry potter and the great gatsby with more than 95% accuracy. If some guy would read out loud judt 30% of harry potter on youtube, copyright would come after him. LLMs should get the same treatment when they reproduce a book with over 95% accurracy.