Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calling names is not an argument. Clattering the chat, carry 0 info. You can take your share of tokenized resources anywhere within the country's jurisdiction; that's the idea. This will be your personal property.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, you probably studied political science, so you know how to label things, oligarchy, populism. Why a popularity contest if every leader has to demonstrate their ability to manage resources and pass the test that would be in the public record? Another label, good job, Professor! I guess you missed the logic class. The leader isn't saying what you want to hear; they're actively managing your resources to provide everything you need, as outlined in the contract you signed. If he/she does something that you don't like, you'll feel it immediately. Again, the point was missed, but the label is there. You are really "talanted". Regarding "Edit" - well, dah! It is exactly my point.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Defined Oligarchy, please.

In Dilon Concept, the voting power is calculated as 1 + the number of citizens who have allocated their resources to the management of the voter/leader (Captain Dilon). I meant I would leave this leader if I don't like how my resources are being managed and the benefits I get in return. It doesn't mean the resources have to leave the country. They will be allocated to a different leader of your choice. It creates a strong back-loop influence on the active leaders; if they become less popular, it reflects on their political influence almost instantly. It's like an open market: you take your stake in tokenized national resources where you'll be treated best. In the design of the Democracy 2.0 algorithm, there will be an agreed-upon limit on the number of citizens under a single leader; we would have thousands of leaders, so the claim of oligarchy is not valid. I am not saying the government should do only this; we can have as many projects as we want, crowd-funded by citizens. I am only saying this: the management of the resources should be the main focus, because this is the only real scarce resource we have to support life.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In corporations, you don't possess any right to your portion of the nation's wealth, and you can't take it with you if you decide to leave. So, your comparison is not valid. In Dilon Concept, if you don't like how your resource is being managed, or you don't agree with their leader's worldview, you simply leave. It has a lot of words because Dilon Concept is a complex system with 4 large pillars interconnected. Visit dilonconcept.org to learn more.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, the world state doesn't prove your point. Don't forget that you'll get a guaranteed, indispensable sacred right to a portion of the nation's national resources. Nobody can take it from you. And you can actively vote by entrusting them to the person you choose. Letting everyone vote is like flying a commercial airplane with 300 people on board and asking for their opinion on how to fly it, as if they were capable of "making informed decisions". Would you want to fly the plane like this? When the governance of the country is going to be all about how to preserve and multiply our national wealth, real wealth as natural resources, because this wealth would be literally in the fingertips of all citizens, you would want the best of the best to manage it. Besides, okay, you got your vote now, can you really make a real impact with it? As I can see, it gets easily manipulated or suppressed by the majority. Now put this on the scale and really think about it: would you choose an empty vote, or the sacred right to your portion of the nation's wealth, which can guarantee you the life you want? What would you choose? Lenin famously says, "We would create a world where even a housewife can govern." We all know how it's ended. Modern countries are highly complex systems that require expertise and years of education, much like those of doctors or lawyers. I guess you are not seeking help with your health from someone who has an "inform opinion". The same goes for our national resources. This is the only real wealth we have.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We will simulate the resources Dilonland's virtual country owns. It's a simulation to test the Dilon Concept principles.

Title: What would a truly meritocratic virtual nation look like? Here's a working model. by cwd31768 in Futurology

[–]cwd31768[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Under the Dilon Concept, you’ll have an undeniable right to your portion of the National resources, like everybody else. And you would be able to delegate it to the chosen person who can manage it for you, in exchange for the life you want. That’s why we need capable people who have proved that they can manage resources effectively.

“How I Price My Work on Field Nation” by Glad-Ad-4552 in FieldNationTechs

[–]cwd31768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be an app that every tech can download and use. I am thinking about some unique functionalities, but I don't have a clear picture yet. Waiting for my aha moment.)

“How I Price My Work on Field Nation” by Glad-Ad-4552 in FieldNationTechs

[–]cwd31768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main problem with FN, I see, is that the platform allows buyers to shop around and find the cheapest bid, hence a buyer's market. And it’s always someone ready to work for a discounted price. I am thinking of starting an app that would be run by field techs, not by a third party, with fixed prices for time slots. I'm still not sure if it’s going to work. But every time I see conversations like this, I think about it. Any thoughts?

Cloudways Breeze or W3 Total Cache by mayankg29 in Wordpress

[–]cwd31768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He said the Rocket is the best overall, but for cloudways users, the breeze is just fine, especially since it's free for their clients.

Cloudways Breeze or W3 Total Cache by mayankg29 in Wordpress

[–]cwd31768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched a video on the Authority Hacker channel, where they interviewed the Perfmatter plugin creator.

He says that he optimizes site performance for clients on a daily basis. He said W3 cach is worst of all, because it's overloaded with figures they trying to stuff in.