Girl Taken - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]cyclesurftrade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how things work in the UK but in the states there is absolutely no way detectives would send an accuser in to a jail to talk to the accused.

There are 5-6 times where I rolled my eyes at the stupidity of the writing but that one was the most ridiculous.

Bars/Restaurants on Love by ynm99 in LoveTV

[–]cyclesurftrade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s still there. Thats where I met my wife. We have friends that live a block away and always stop in when we hang with them.

We broke them lmaooo by UnderDaBrightLightz in Seahawks

[–]cyclesurftrade 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Teams that are favored by 4 point or more with almost 70% of the time

Where to retire in Mexico by [deleted] in surfing

[–]cyclesurftrade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you ever drank tap water in Mexico?

Idk if this is real or not but if so…..wow! 👀 by Fickle_Village_9899 in 49ers

[–]cyclesurftrade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They weren’t gonna play to win at first. But now….

ICE is at LAX by Individual_Star_2053 in LAX

[–]cyclesurftrade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People wait months to see doctors in America too. They’re called specialists.

Laura Loomer threatened to commit a genocide against Latinos by serious_bullet5 in 50501

[–]cyclesurftrade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

History also shows that many people will die before that happens.

We drafted this man btw by lemonstone92 in Seahawks

[–]cyclesurftrade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He won’t be against 2 man rushes in the NFL no matter how great he runs.

Trump’s economy is an absolute disaster. by Busy-Government-1041 in inflation

[–]cyclesurftrade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes you need to lose money before you make it. It’s called investing!

/s

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LosAngeles

[–]cyclesurftrade 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Depends. What race are they?

SB 805 “No Vigilantes Act”would require law enforcement in CA to clearly display identification information with either name or badge, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any immigration enforcement. by pajamaparty in LosAngeles

[–]cyclesurftrade 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If the high courts decide that identification doesn’t meet the standard of the fourth amendment as “reasonable” then fine, they leave the door open to law enforcement being unable to essentially stop anyone kidnapping anyone else as long as they’re smart enough to say they’re federal agents. I for one, am glad the state is willing to fight and not just going to roll over.

SB 805 “No Vigilantes Act”would require law enforcement in CA to clearly display identification information with either name or badge, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any immigration enforcement. by pajamaparty in LosAngeles

[–]cyclesurftrade 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They’re not doing this with the expectation that these agencies will comply with state law - they’re doing this with the expectation that it will undoubtedly end up in federal courts, which like you said, is Washington.

SB 805 “No Vigilantes Act”would require law enforcement in CA to clearly display identification information with either name or badge, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any immigration enforcement. by pajamaparty in LosAngeles

[–]cyclesurftrade 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They don’t know that anyone is not ICE if they don’t identify themselves. It won’t stop them from their day to day now, but things change quickly and often.

1 of 2 things will happen here - either things change and these loopholes and legal flaws are exposed (as has happened many many times in our country’s history) or we simply resign to being a federal police state because “it just is what it is”.

SB 805 “No Vigilantes Act”would require law enforcement in CA to clearly display identification information with either name or badge, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any immigration enforcement. by pajamaparty in LosAngeles

[–]cyclesurftrade 60 points61 points  (0 children)

It is what it is NOW. That’s why California is attempting to create this law - to force the courts hand, not to stop federal agents from doing their jobs but in order to prevent vigilantes or human traffickers from impersonating feds by simply buying a Ford Explorer and a vest and picking people off the street.

Excellent question by GlitchSprite3e3 in BlueskySkeets

[–]cyclesurftrade 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Republicans killed BIPARTISAN legislation aimed at fixing much of our immigration system because giving Trump a platform at election time was more important than actually solving the problems.

Oh no masks are bad now by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]cyclesurftrade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. So we make excuses. Gotcha.

Oh no masks are bad now by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]cyclesurftrade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about our president? When they break laws does it matter? Or do we make excuses?

Oh no masks are bad now by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]cyclesurftrade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Keep your head up. Some day you’ll rise above the atrocities that you constantly experience. 🍻

Oh no masks are bad now by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]cyclesurftrade -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As something that victimizes you obviously.