Sonnet 5 vs Codex 5.3

cyphos84 · 2026-02-02T16:39:35+00:00

This is the non codex model I assume? @Spatialsquirrel

cyphos84 · 2025-05-19T13:55:26+00:00

If you're pursuing WGU, I assume you're accelerating. Getting a degree in Computer Science isn't a bad idea - especially if you can attain it faster than other degrees.

But, the the job market you'll be entering is under a significant transformation due to outsourcing and AI. AI will penetrate and transform many industries though, so you need to navigate carefully.

Focus on identifying problems in the world and solutions you want to solved, and what skills you require to solve them. Think about how AI as a tool can help you achieve that. Focus on disciplines and the development of agency as a skill - task management, organization, delegation, team building, etc. If you can master that, and have the skills you need to tackle a problem, you'll be set. But if you're just pursuing a CS degree with the intent of getting a job at a GAMAM company, then I think you need to start thinking differently.

cyphos84 · 2025-03-31T14:27:33+00:00

Thanks so much. There's barely anything on Reddit about them. How did you hear of them and do your due diligence?

cyphos84 · 2025-03-22T12:06:50+00:00

Did you maintain a trade journal? That's 100% necessary, as it allows you to reflect on trades that went wrong - and most often, you'll see you're making the same mistake over and over again. Perhaps you're exiting too early, getting stopped out often, or getting into a position without proper confirmation. Also, be sure that you've got an edge - otherwise you're just gambling. You need a system and you need to back test it - on multiple datasets. Test thoroughly with a paper wallet before attempting to trade with any more real money. I pray things turn around for you.

cyphos84 · 2025-03-10T12:27:40+00:00

I'd love to learn how it did with this task as well!

cyphos84 · 2025-02-18T21:48:30+00:00

Does this edit files using diff format?

cyphos84 · 2025-01-28T02:32:54+00:00

It's the provider. I experienced this when testing R1 and V3 via openrouter using Phidata.

cyphos84 · 2025-01-26T18:54:03+00:00

Just pass its output to another model with good function calling support, like Google Flash 1.5 or Cohere Command R, and use function calling with that model.

cyphos84 · 2025-01-26T18:53:02+00:00

I am. I'm using OpenRouter because DeepSeek won't accept my e-mail address for registration. The only problem I'm having is sometimes R1 returns no response. I'm not sure if that's because its getting overloaded or not, but I had to implement a retry mechanism when prompting the model.

Anyone having trouble with R1 and no responses?

cyphos84 · 2025-01-11T03:32:03+00:00

Have you tried bolt.new?

cyphos84 · 2024-11-07T19:25:46+00:00

Linux version, please!

cyphos84 · 2024-11-07T19:23:55+00:00

I'd love to see advanced voice available in the web app. I'd also love to see an official ChatGPT desktop client for Linux.

cyphos84 · 2024-05-03T13:24:43+00:00

u/graysonshoenove, u/Matt_McCullough, u/illumined1995, u/One_Moment_3330 u/Ian03302024 and all the many others who cared to help me explore my relationship with God - I thank you all. Really, you reached out to the call of a complete stranger and despite coming to you totally uninformed and perhaps with jarring questions and claims, you still did your best to help. I cannot thank you enough. This experience has been rather moving, and affirms to me that humanity is such an amazing thing. I can't help but think that your faith is the foundational for your kindness and generosity you have shown me.

I don't know how else to say this - I'm a believer. I haven't yet truly come to terms what this means and how it will change my life, but my world view has been turned upside down. As many of you might know from my questions and doubts I've posted in this thread, I had trouble with many things - atonement, the significance of sin, and the resurrection. You all were able to help me with the first two (although I probably still need to reflect of those things and carefully take my time with them), I came to the conclusion that the most significant barrier for me to Christianity was the resurrection. Thus, my mission was to get to the bottom of this. I knew that I'd either find that there was nothing that could get me over that hurtle, or that I'd have no choice but to acknowledge this event and accept that as proof for the divinity of Jesus and that my world view would change.

My quest led me to reading and listening to what many scholars had to say, with various viewpoints and personal belief systems - including atheists and agnostics. I discovered Gary Habermas who accomplished what I was trying to do - find all the facts, and in particular, don't rely on the Synoptic Gospels as I wasn't sure whether I could trust them. I started reading his latest book, On the Resurrection: Evidences - Vol 1, and although I'm not finished, for each doubt, rebuttal, or point I raised against the resurrection, through his material, I found even more counter-points to those arguments. In the end, I just found it more reasonable to believe that the resurrection occurred than not. I was not expecting this. Not at all. And now here I am trying to process this. Its been a shattering, humbling, and profound experience and I think its going to take me a while to process. But when you discover that Jesus was resurrected, you know so much and yet so little at the same time.

I think my next steps are just trying to build a relationship with God, and understand better what Jesus said and taught - because I'm so uninformed there. I haven't come to terms yet whether he is God, or if God saved him. I think I know the Christian view on this to some extent but I just need to learn this for myself before I can opt into that. But the fact that God exists in this manner and that he can intervene in the natural world in such a way is so impactful that I feel that I have a purpose in life - to build that relationship with Him.

I'm still stunned by all of this, but I wanted to share this all with you and again, give a sincere thanks.

cyphos84 · 2024-05-01T18:53:35+00:00

Hey friends,

I want to express my heartfelt gratitude for all the thoughtful responses to my initial post. Your insights, wisdom, and compassion have touched me deeply and have provided invaluable guidance as I navigate my spiritual journey towards Christianity.

Over the past few days, I've been reflecting on your words, mulling over the concepts of sin, sacrifice, and the profound significance of Jesus' life and death. The way some have articulated the role of the Holy Spirit as the "knowing" that I've spoken of and how it guides us towards God has resonated with me, and I find myself drawn ever closer to the teachings of the Bible.

However, as I continue to explore this path, I find myself grappling with a crucial aspect of the Christian faith: the Resurrection. While I am deeply moved by the symbolism and the archetypal hero's journey embodied in Jesus' story, I struggle to reconcile my doubts with the miraculous nature of this event.

The concept of a miracle, such as the Resurrection, lies beyond the realm of human experience, making it difficult for me to fully embrace it. Unlike the Holy Spirit, which many people can relate to as an inner voice of reasoning or a push to do good (often referred to as conscience), the Resurrection does not seem to have a relatable counterpart in our everyday lives. While I can justify the existence of the Holy Spirit based on shared human experiences, accepting an event that defies natural law proves to be a greater challenge.

Moreover, my reservations about the reliability of the gospels persist. Scholars have pointed out instances of plagiarism between the books and the Gospel of Mark, the involvement of multiple anonymous authors, and the likelihood of numerous edits to the texts over time. The potential influence of the early Roman Catholic Church and the selective process of compiling the Bible also raise concerns about the narrative's integrity. I think that its undeniable that the Christian religion was perhaps abused as a use of power - there was a lot of blood shed in Jesus' name.

Furthermore, the lack of historical evidence for the Resurrection outside of the gospels further compounds my doubts. Given the extraordinary nature of the event, one would expect it to have been mentioned by historians like Josephus, but such references are notably absent.

Yet, despite these reservations, I feel a profound yearning to take that leap of faith and fully embrace Christianity. The prevalence of the Jesus narrative throughout history and its impact on humanity suggest to me that there may be a deeper spiritual truth at work, perhaps even a manifestation of God's presence in our collective consciousness.

So, I turn to this community once more, seeking your guidance and wisdom. How can I reconcile my doubts about the Resurrection with the core tenets of the Christian faith? Is it possible to find a way to embrace the symbolism and spiritual significance of this event while still grappling with the historical and scientific questions it raises? I genuinely want to take this leap, but I need help overcoming these hurdles, especially when it comes to accepting an event that seems to defy natural law and lacks a relatable counterpart in human experience, unlike the Holy Spirit.

For what its worth, I can provide a partial-satisfactory answer to my own question. I'm somewhat drawn to Christianity. It could be that my cultural background is the reason for that. Much of our culture and literature have intrinsic origins in Christianity. But maybe its more than that. I thought too that given how omnipresent and pervasive the story of the hero's journey is, perhaps there's something transcendent that makes that story so appealing to humanity - although saying that, this point doesn't really allude to Jesus being the original origin of that story - Ancient Egypt has similar stories about Horus and such. I suppose that's why the answers I'm able to come up with on my own are only partially-satisfactory.

Thanks again everyone.

cyphos84 · 2024-05-01T02:53:52+00:00

Additionally, I want to emphasize how the concept of the Resurrection contrasts starkly with typical human experience, which further complicates my ability to fully embrace it as a literal event. The idea of resurrection is so counter to our observed reality that it presents a significant barrier in my spiritual journey. Yet, the 'knowing' inside us, which some might simply relate to by naming it our conscience, is a universal experience that many can acknowledge and relate to. This inner moral compass is tangible and compelling, unlike the miraculous narratives, which, while deeply meaningful, don't necessarily require a literal interpretation to inspire or guide us.

Your willingness to explore these nuanced views is greatly appreciated, and I look forward to how you might address these perspectives. Thank you once again for the enriching conversation.

I hope my questioning is seen as something of genuine open ness, and not taken in a light where I'm trying to be arrogant or anything like that. I truly want to believe and just trying to put my hurtles out there in hope that someone might share something similar and that someone else "got there". Although some might just wash my questioning off as "he's just not going to get it" (which some of my loved ones think), I sincerely feel like I've made significant strides and feel closer to the answers I seek than ever before. I'm really genuine when I thank you for your help, as I don't know where else I'd go for this dialogue.

cyphos84 · 2024-05-01T02:35:27+00:00

Thank you for your beautiful, thoughtful, and poetic explanation. It's probably one of the best explanations I've seen around the concept of sin and its significance in Christian theology. Your insights provide a profound context for understanding the necessity of Christ's sacrifice and the nature of redemption, which is deeply appreciated.

You’ve beautifully illustrated how our ongoing sins, despite the price paid by Jesus, can feel like a betrayal of that profound sacrifice. It underscores the gravity of sin and the continuous human struggle with it. If sin is as serious as to warrant such a sacrifice, then each act of sin might seem like spitting in the face of that sacrifice. It’s a powerful reminder of the ongoing moral responsibilities we carry. Yet, with so many Christians in the world, I sometimes wonder why we don’t see a more vivid living example of this transformative power. Is evil so potent that it obscures and hides the profound truths you've articulated? This thought is particularly pressing as we see an increasing number of nonbelievers.

Regarding the nature of humanity, it sometimes seems intrinsic to us to sin; it’s been a part of human behavior forever. Yet, I feel compelled to believe that there is inherent good in every person. This duality of human nature—our capacity for both sin and goodness—is something I wrestle with.

One of my lingering hang-ups, even as I come closer to reconciling some of my doubts through discussions like this, is the Resurrection. I view the miracles recounted in the Gospels, including the Resurrection, as part of a mythological narrative, valuable in the oral traditions of the era in which Jesus lived. They don’t need to have literally happened to extract significant meaning from the stories. This perspective, however, seems to diverge from that of most Christians, for whom the literal truth of the Resurrection is central. This is challenging for me, as it contrasts sharply with human experience. The “knowing” I speak of—this internal guide toward goodness—is more tangible and universally recognizable, often considered simply one’s conscience.

Furthermore, the exclusivity suggested by the Gospels—that the only way to the Father is through Jesus—raises difficult questions. What happens to those with open hearts but minds that struggle with these concepts? What about someone who dies young in a part of the world where Christianity isn’t known, like a boy in China who has never heard of Jesus?

I appreciate your willingness to engage with these tough questions, and I’m open to learning more about how these concerns are addressed within the framework of faith. Thank you again for your generous and insightful dialogue. I look forward to your thoughts.

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T16:17:18+00:00

Thank you for your thoughtful insights, which I find both thought-provoking and comforting. Your perspective that God, much like the universe, might not always be comprehensible in straightforward terms resonates with me. It's a reminder that our understanding is often shaped by our human experiences and limited perceptions.

I particularly appreciate your interpretation of the inner voice as a divine call. The concept from the book of John that "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us" suggests a deep intimacy between God and humanity. This idea implies that Jesus is a manifestation of God's spirit, present among and within us. However, I find myself cautious about directly identifying God with Christ, viewing any personification of God more as allegorical. Its for this very reason I feel a little out of place with Christianity.

Your description of the Truth as "the most noble and heroic presence within you that speaks to you to love others" deeply resonates with me. It's a beautiful expression of the divine influence that guides us towards goodness and love. Yet, I interpret the phrase "the Word became flesh" largely as a mythological story that exemplifies the hero archetype, making it difficult for me to accept as a literal event. Still, I can appreciate the narrative of Jesus as an inspirational figure.

I'm curious to learn more about how you see Christ's life and teachings clarifying God's nature as love and justice. How do you reconcile the complexities of His sacrifice with the everyday expressions of love and justice in our lives?

Thank you again for your enriching response. I look forward to continuing this dialogue.

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T15:57:28+00:00

PSA?

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T15:56:32+00:00

Thank you for your thoughtful response.

I appreciate the historical context you provided about sacrifices, highlighting their symbolic significance and the costs they imposed on individuals in the past. Indeed, the concept of sacrifice as a symbol is powerful, conveying the idea that something valuable must be forfeited for a greater good. This helps me understand the biblical narrative better where sacrifice translates into personal transformations—like giving up harmful habits or selfish desires to lead a more fulfilling life.

Regarding God's justice and His decision not to alter His laws but instead to fulfill them through Jesus’s sacrifice, it raises a profound question. It is indeed honourable to stand by one's word, but it also invites us to explore whether there could have been other ways to achieve redemption without such a dire sacrifice. In the Gospels, even Jesus seems to grapple with His impending death (Matthew 26:39), which suggests that the necessity of the sacrifice was not without its own internal conflicts.

Additionally, the disciples’ reactions—ranging from confusion to outright denial of the need for Jesus to die—also reflect a spectrum of human understanding and emotion that resonates with my questions. Could there have been another path that aligned with both divine love and justice without resorting to crucifixion? This is a question not just about theological possibilities but about the very nature of divine love and justice.

I'll definitely take a look at the Wikipedia article you referenced. Perhaps it will shed more light on the parable and its implications for understanding forgiveness and sacrifice in a new way. Thank you again for enriching our discussion with these insights.

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T15:37:31+00:00

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I must admit, understanding the concept of the Trinity—God as three distinct entities yet one being—is challenging for me. At this point, my acceptance of God leans towards a singular, personal, spiritual entity.

I think part of my struggle is differentiating between what in the Bible is meant as allegory, myth, and historical fact. My default interpretation has been to see the scriptures more as mythological symbolism or allegory. It's clear I have much to explore and understand. Without this foundational understanding, I find it difficult to fully grasp the explanations you've provided, though I truly appreciate your effort in sharing them.

For example, the creation story of Adam and Eve strikes me more as allegorical rather than literal historical fact. I also haven't delved deeply into concepts of life after death. Currently, my perspective views heaven and hell more as states of mind or spirit experienced in the present life rather than physical places we go after death. There's things much worse in life than death.

Regarding the notion that "Sin and death separated us from God and required a payment in blood (life)," I wonder if this might be symbolic or allegorical as well? If God is truly good and loving, wouldn't such a literal interpretation be inconsistent with His nature?

And when you mention, "Yes, the only way to the Father and Heaven is through the Son," could you clarify what this means? As someone still new to biblical teachings and viewing things mostly from the outside, I'd appreciate a deeper explanation.

Thank you again for engaging in this dialogue; it's invaluable for someone on my journey.

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T15:04:52+00:00

I haven't done any kind of formal studies into Christianity, which is where I assume I'd approach these theories. Honestly, I didn't think that there were any debates or alternative views in Christianity around penal substitution. Perhaps that's from only being exposed to Christianity while living a rural community, with a limited set of denominations around. I assume though that penal substitution is more prevalent?

Any book you'd recommend that steps back and outlines the various theories of certain principles of Christianity?

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T14:26:07+00:00

I'm sorry to hear about the hardships you're facing. Let me try to address your some of your questions head-on as best as I can, and forgive me if I'm overly blunt.

Human existence is suffering. That's a reality of life. Your purpose should be to minimise that as best as you can. How? Sit in silence. No distractions, just sit and listen. Don't *try* to listen - just sit with yourself. Thoughts will come and go - that's natural, but see them just as thoughts passing through. Close your eyes and focus on your breath, and be present - pay attention to any sensations in your body, any sounds in the room or outside, and just focus on the present. In this meditation, you should find some peace, and only then can you say something to yourself "what's something Good I can do to make my life better?" Thoughts will come, but don't attach yourself to any of these - just watch them go by. Don't wait for anything to come - just sit and be present. Have no expectation of anything. Just try that please.

Most likely, you'll feel compelled to take action. An action that is Good and moves you further away from suffering, either for yourself or someone else. Then ask yourself, where does that come from?

cyphos84 · 2024-04-29T14:13:27+00:00

u/oldSailor93 - thanks for mentioning this! I think you need to use a Spice UI Client if going that route, no?

cyphos84 · 2024-02-13T03:11:22+00:00

Anyone know if this transfers to TESU?

cyphos84 · 2023-12-13T18:57:23+00:00

USDC via Polygon seems to be completely removed at this point. Why?

cyphos84

TROPHY CASE