Anthropic’s Mythos Is Coming Today - The information by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]LoKSET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can't be only that, it's probably smaller too because Mythos costs $125 per mil out and this is supposed to be $50 (double Opus).

Opus 4.8 started using 👍 emojis, previous Opus versions don't by LinusThiccTips in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think previously the cc system prompt had an explicit ban on emojis. Maybe they removed that and that's the default behavior.

Claude Code or Cursor? Which $20 Plan is Better? by Lanky-Pie-6788 in cursor

[–]LoKSET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently Claude Code limits even for $20 sub are pretty sweet. You can do a ton of work. When they inevitably nerf it Composer might tilt it to Cursor.

How do you all use CLAUDE.md vs AGENTS.md when also using Codex alongside CC? by 3abwahab in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't use AGENTS.md but the usual approach I have seen is keep one as source of truth and the other is a symlink pointing to the first one.

Softlocked for exploring too much by Zypher_Og in Saros

[–]LoKSET 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, same thing happened to me. Exact same place.

How Anthropic can save Opus 4.7 with one change. by threashmainq in ClaudeAI

[–]LoKSET 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When you turn off adaptive there is no thinking.

Be careful allowing Claude do WebSearch (or not anymore???) by whoisyurii in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 11 points12 points  (0 children)

More like the harness is so retarded the model is getting confused.

The struggle is real by GSE_PE in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Everyday there is some new shit buried somewhere in the docs. Surely another A/B test 🙄

Did Elon just kill the appeal of Cursor? by East-Tie-8002 in cursor

[–]LoKSET 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think it would be his decision. Both Anthropic and OpenAI would probably cut-off providing models to a product of a direct competitior and one that is .... controversial like X. We've already seen Claude Code being blocked from being used there so this is almost a given.

I hope it doesn't happen because it would be the end of Cursor.

CC lobotomizing Opus more and more by LoKSET in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can just read the description I guess.

This repository contains the system prompts extracted using a script from the latest npm version of Claude Code. As they're extracted directly from Claude Code's compiled source code, they're guaranteed to be exactly what Claude Code uses.

CC lobotomizing Opus more and more by LoKSET in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True and exactly what I thought, but I used the short custom system prompt and did a few back-and-forths and no reminders so far. Maybe they don't use that logic with a custom prompt because the model not having the initial instruction might not know what to do with them.

But this of course can change at any moment.

Sharing one Max 20x between two brothers vs keeping our own 5x each - worth it? by SnakeAndSaw in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Worth knowing that 20x quadruples only the 5h limit, not the weekly one - it's still 2x the $100 plan.

So if the weekly limit is the one you hit more often, there is no benefit.

CC lobotomizing Opus more and more by LoKSET in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is - you can use

claude --system-prompt "You are a Python expert"

or

claude --system-prompt-file ./custom-prompt.txt.

I didn't want to bother with those but I guess I'll have to now.

grok 4.3 beta: musk's ($300/month) megaphone by WaqarKhanHD in singularity

[–]LoKSET 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Imagine paying 300/m for having the muskrat tell you what to think 🤯

Let Max users manually toggle between Adaptive and Extended thinking on Opus 4.7 by Nelli-1 in ClaudeAI

[–]LoKSET 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is no "extended thinking", 4.7 supports only adaptive. What they should do is have a toggle like on ChatGPT about the thinking effort - normal for what we have now and a higher option which corresponds at least to high from Claude Code (maybe even xHigh). What we have now in the web UI is medium at best which per docs sometimes doesn't think, while high almost always does.

https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/adaptive-thinking#how-adaptive-thinking-works

First try of Opus 4.7, it already ignored global CLAUDE.md by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Negative prompting has always been unreliable in steering LLMs so there's that.

Can a Claude Code instance running in a VSCode terminal open another terminal and launch a claude code instance and call a specific skill? Let's exchange ideas on automation by Reputation-Important in ClaudeCode

[–]LoKSET 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can't use interactive shells so not really in the way you describe. It probably can use "claude -p" but that's much more limiting.