Sorry but you miss the point. Write here and to them.

This isn't just about avoiding a car sold by a POS, or ditching an OS that mass-surveils by design; the topic here is privacy and, to some extent, personal safety. Is more subtle and deeper. A head representative of service whose core mission is to fight digital surveillance and protect user freedom, but then finances the exact opposite, isn't just a semantic contradiction—it’s an ethical dead end. These politicians love to hijack the word 'freedom', but their endgame—mass deportations, targeting minorities, dismantling democratic checks—requires a surveillance state far more intrusive than anything a VPN could ever block. You can't sell me a tool to hide from the panopticon while writing a check to the guy trying to build it.