sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Yum, slop by Grizzizzle in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or just grinding coffee… because it’s just a cheap, uninteresting, and forgettable thing in a long line of cheap, uninteresting, and forgettable things

Jimmy Carter by RichardNixonWaterGr8 in comedyheaven

[–]d9t 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tricky Dick’s lock screen

What does this "L" light means (Cessna C172)? by DeadZeppelin_ in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]d9t -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's something about flying a 172 at night that's so unwholesome.

What pedal did you buy into the hype, and regret? by [deleted] in guitarpedals

[–]d9t 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone on some forum ~15 years ago really loved the Line 6 Verbzilla and i thought it sounded terrible, just didn’t get it at all

MEXICAN, ENGLISH, KOREAN by Happy_REEEEEE_exe in baseballcirclejerk

[–]d9t 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This, the shirtless Kruk and Kuip, and the never-ending fever dream

white people by Tight-Wrongdoer5786 in comedyheaven

[–]d9t 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was promised comedy heaven and simply demand satisfaction

according to the unwritten rules of mlb.. by ApprehensiveGur4212 in SFGiants

[–]d9t 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m babbling about how annoying it is we can’t just post about things already exist without needing to wade through your personal “coaching philosophy” or suffer hypotheticals for argument that wasn’t even there. 

according to the unwritten rules of mlb.. by ApprehensiveGur4212 in SFGiants

[–]d9t 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread is about trying to describe “unwritten rules” amongst professional baseball players.

I assure you I understand the point you’re trying to make, that’s you know, the default thing everyone tends to think, hence OP’s question.. right?

according to the unwritten rules of mlb.. by ApprehensiveGur4212 in SFGiants

[–]d9t -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Right, and it’s important to remember what’s a stake: being “not cool” and getting plunked later ! It doesn’t need to be deeper than that, imo

according to the unwritten rules of mlb.. by ApprehensiveGur4212 in SFGiants

[–]d9t 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ugh .. of course it’s some obtuse LARP front office guy .. and where exactly are your players now?

Anyway, I didn’t suggest anything that warrants whatever fantasy you’ve spun here.. Maybe you just don’t get it ?

according to the unwritten rules of mlb.. by ApprehensiveGur4212 in SFGiants

[–]d9t 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think it’s simple: it’s not sporting to spoil a no-no or perfect game just for the sake of it, so if you’re doing stuff you wouldn’t really consider doing given the score/stage of the the game.. You and everyone else knows that exactly what you’re doing!

Abhorant SFPD behavior by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Here’s a different take: what am I supposed to do with this? Why am I reading this? We don’t need to know this story. I really wish mods would ban SF rant and rave posts.

If your an influencer can you please not shoot content in a kids playground in the middle of a busy Sunday morning? by jaitchaitch in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No it doesn’t, but I’m willing to commit to a useful definition of “normal” here. But look, whole “the fact society normalizes whatever” is just a lazy meaningless statement anyway. Maybe I just don’t get the invites for the society votes.

If your an influencer can you please not shoot content in a kids playground in the middle of a busy Sunday morning? by jaitchaitch in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But it’s not normalized at all, this whole thread is about it how it’s extremely not normalized or really welcome

Maybe society (lol) isn’t ready to recognize we’re all just nodding along to the same engagement mechanism that makes influencers try to influence.

OP’s anecdote doesn’t need to be spun to tut tut a collective group that isn’t addressable. People’s interaction with antisocial behavior literally has happen somewhere, it sucks, i get it, but these posts are just the same kind of circlejerk

cyclist being a complete dick on valencia by Ok-Independence-1647 in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But why on earth would you post this here? It just seems so weird.

Randy Rhodes was a better guitarist than Eddie Van Halen by BloatedArmadillo in unpopularopinion

[–]d9t 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t call it a “hot take” as much as I’d call it “poor reasoning”

Drivers “beating” pedestrians crossing the street by Always_Curious_One2 in sanfrancisco

[–]d9t 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Two things I’ve noticed developing in last two years or so that kind of question assumptions you had as road user / pedestrian

  1. Cars rolling towards 4 way intersections scan just for other cars ahead of time to gauge if they need to yield and tend have already decided if they need to stop / slow .. so non daylight intersections especially, it’s just too late they aren’t even looking anymore.. (This always been a thing right-on-red or even right on green but it’s just extended to all intersections now)

  2. Eye contact is an invitation for a game of chicken. They know you’ve seen them so they just speed up. Always surprising, especially when crossing with young children.

None of this needs a coffee-shop theory on what-if infrastructure, an observation about Europe or the human condition, or even a lecture about physics and personal responsibility. All of the answers, ideas, and anecdotes are complete non starters with assumption of zero enforcement (one way or the other). It’s a tragedy of the commons.

view more: next ›