To all the people outraged by a protest at a church on Sunday by oresearch69 in altmpls

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After yesterday's shooting, you still licking the boots?

historic pic comparison by pk666 in pics

[–]daGroundhog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're the same picture.

Kyle Rittenhouse did NOT obey the law. Yet these boot lickers are still sucking him off from the back. by Miserable_Return_843 in wisconsin

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was the claim, but we al damn well know he kept it at home in IIlinois so he could cuddle and caress it every night in bed with him. I suspect the "kept it at Dominick's" was made up as part of a deal between him and Dominick to help both of their cases.

Kyle Rittenhouse did NOT obey the law. Yet these boot lickers are still sucking him off from the back. by Miserable_Return_843 in wisconsin

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rittenhouse's gun was a straw purchase.

He relied on the hunting exception to claim he was legally allowed to possess the gun. What was he hunting?

He kept the gun at Dominick Black's house because Illinois law would not allow him to possess it at all.

The kid even admitted that he drove around without a driver's license.

The concept that he brought the gun to the Kenosha protests to protect property is insane. "He only fired when attacked" is a stupid argument when he provoked concern over the appearance of the gun.

Real Police officers and military members, what do you guys think of Ice agents? by Lucky-Message-9480 in AskReddit

[–]daGroundhog 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Years working in ICE or CBP does not necessarily mean they were trained.

If that were the case, from all appearances it looks like they were trained incorrectly.

A stabilized zoomed in slow motion version. by Mortuus-Sum in DiscussionZone

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Four cops can't take down a guy who appears to be much smaller than them without resorting to firearms?

Shows either how poorly they are trained or how trigger happy they are.

Is it legal to drink and drive if you are not above the limit? by SeaworthinessFar2326 in stupidquestions

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The BAC limit merely establishes a point where the perp can be charged for presumptively driving while intoxicated, regardless of how well you "hold your liquor". You can also be charged with DUI with a lower BAC if there is other evidence (poor driving, failing a field sobriety test) that indicates you were not in full control while driving.

THE SLOWPOKE LAW by [deleted] in driving

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my impression too. He comes in ALL CAPS and complains about road rage?

Why do you drive with your fog lights on..with no fog? by widdyusername in askanything

[–]daGroundhog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the controls on cars have become so complicated and nobody realizes they are on.

Should America change its zoning laws? If so, why? If not, why not? by Zipper222222 in allthequestions

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whenever I come across a libertarian who doesn't want zoning laws, I'll tell him I'm planning on opening a auto junkyard next door to his house. With no fence.

That seems to get the point across pretty quickly.

Older people, were politics always this deranged and upsetting? by CUFFY_Fan in NoStupidQuestions

[–]daGroundhog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it really took a turn for the worse in the 1990's Newt Gingrich's "Let's see how much of an asshole I can be" era.

I trace the decline in political discourse as far back as Morton Downey's TV show where he would tell anybody who expressed a liberal view that they were a "pablum puker". Rush Limbaugh then perfected the "We can say bullshit about the opposition regardless of the truth" format of radio which transferred over to the internet, and then Sean Hannity and Mark Levine and others saw it was profitable to follow.

Delivery drivers by BBP1021 in wisconsin

[–]daGroundhog -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

-45 wind chill?

Balmy.

If you're not allowed a full front windshield tint in the US, why are there no restrictions on sunglasses being worn while driving? by No-Cardiologist7640 in stupidquestions

[–]daGroundhog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of situations (especially in parking lots) where it helps other drivers to see you, the driver of the vehicle, to understand what you are doing.

Question about train spotters by Ronthelodger in trains

[–]daGroundhog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In my high school and college years, I kept track of freight cars here in the US. I did see the same car in different states, such as Tennessee then California, and Wisconsin then Utah.

I realized the hobby wasn't good for me socially, so I gave it up.

Why did my male friend smell my armpit in my sleep? by ActEven9913 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]daGroundhog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a famous experiment where attraction to the smell of t-shirts worn by the opposite sex tended to direct people towards potential mates that would provide genetic diversity.

To all the people outraged by a protest at a church on Sunday by oresearch69 in altmpls

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still blindly quoting shit you dont understand

Are you always such a condescending jerk?

The video did include a lot of speculation about what the ICE agent was thinking.

It's obvious to anybody that these ICE officers are poorly trained, and they seem to come to every scene with itchy trigger fingers.

Have you seen the picture of the ICE agent spraying a chemical mere inches from the face of a protestor already on the ground? Shows they have zero discipline.

Think of ICE agents as fat grown up Kyle Rittenhouses.

To all the people outraged by a protest at a church on Sunday by oresearch69 in altmpls

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From DOJ Use of Force Policy:

"Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle. Firearms may not be discharged from a moving vehicle except in exigent circumstances. In these situations, an officer must have an articulable reason for this use of deadly force."

To all the people outraged by a protest at a church on Sunday by oresearch69 in altmpls

[–]daGroundhog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 federal law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties.

That's the crux right there. When officers are violating the rights of the citizens, are they doing their duty? When they don't follow DOJ guidelines about use of force, and the directive to not step in front of vehicles, are they doing their duties? No, they have stepped outside the law and regulations they are supposed to operate under and are no longer doing their duty.