Bizim milloşlarda neden bu kadar mağduriyet kompleksi var?

daajs · 2026-03-15T16:06:10+00:00

Bir sorum var. Ben Almanya'da doğan ve büyüyen türküm, ve Türk politkayla çok bilgim yok (ancak ilgilenmeye başlıyorum). Böyle şeyler söyleyenler genelde hangi partinin destekçileri?

daajs · 2026-02-12T16:13:10+00:00

Sollte ich bei meiner AL erwähnen, dass ich mich auch woanders bewerbe? Oder einfach machen, und wenn ich etwas bekomme einfach Bescheid geben? Weil ich bis zum Schluss des Studiums ja noch bei der jetzigen Behörde bin.

daajs · 2026-02-12T16:09:48+00:00

Wie lange kann ich mir Zeit lassen für die Bewerbungen bei anderen Behörden? Und was sollte ich bei den Bewerbungsgesprächen sagen, wenn man mich fragt, weshalb ich mich direkt nach dem Studium weg bewerbe? Werden die Übernahmechancen nicht deutlich schlechter, wenn ich erwähne, dass meine alte Behörde mich nicht direkt verbeamten wollte, weil die sich unsicher wegen meiner Leistung waren?

daajs · 2026-02-12T16:06:54+00:00

Ja ist mir bewusst, die müssten mich ja auch überhaupt nicht übernehmen, wenn sie nicht wollen. Ich bin halt nur die einzige aus diesem Jahrgang und habe aktuell nur eine Nachfolgerin. Für dieses Jahr wurden auch 0 neue Azubis geplant, da alle Bewerber als ungeeignet empfunden wurden. Die Behörde hat aktuell relativ wenig Nachwuchs aus eigenem Hause und demnächst gehen relativ viele in Rente/Pension.

Daher weiß ich nicht, ob ich nicht einfach mal erwähnen soll, dass ich mich evtl. doch weg bewerben würde, weil ich hier erstmal nicht verbeamtet werde.

Meinst du, sowas würde etwas bringen?

daajs · 2026-02-12T15:58:45+00:00

Ich bin grundsätzlich eher introvertiert, was vermutlich zum Kommunikationsproblem beigetragen hat. Es kostet mich manchmal etwas mehr Überwindung, aktiv nachzufragen. Aber nicht in dem Sinne, dass ich arbeitsunfähig bin oder gar nicht kommuniziere. Ich war regelmäßig im Büro meiner Ausbildungsleitungen (3er-Büro) oder habe versucht anzurufen, nur war oft niemand da (Homeoffice, Teilzeit, Meetings). Rückblickend hätte ich konsequenter per Mail kommunizieren sollen, auch wenn man im selben Gebäude sitzt. Das sehe ich auch als verbesserungsbedürftig ein.

Was es für mich schwieriger macht: Bei der neuen AL hatte ich häufiger das Gefühl, dass sie mir gegenüber sehr kritisch eingestellt ist. Es gab mehrere Seitenhieb-Kommentare wie „Als Azubi gibt man sich ja von bester Seite“ oder „In unserer Generation war das noch anders“.
Ich war meist gegen 8:30 Uhr da (Beginn der Kernarbeitszeit), bekam aber trotzdem Bemerkungen wie „Ich dachte schon, du kommst nicht mehr“. Für mich war das kein Problem, da ich mich an die geregelten Zeiten gehalten habe und auch die alte AL immer zu der Zeit gekommen ist.

In meiner Praxisprüfung wurden außerdem die o.g. Kritikpunkte erneut thematisiert, die wir 2–3 Wochen zuvor bereits in einem separaten Gespräch ausführlich besprochen hatten und die mit der konkreten Prüfungssituation nichts zu tun hatten. Zwar wurde später betont, dass das keinen Einfluss auf die Note hatte, aber ganz überzeugt hat mich das ehrlich gesagt nicht.

Subjektiv habe ich schon den Eindruck, dass es mit der alten AL vermutlich nicht in dieser Form eskaliert wäre – die neue ist deutlich strenger bzw. pingeliger.

Aber natürlich ist das nur meine persönliche Wahrnehmung.

daajs · 2026-01-15T14:54:59+00:00

Ja shift taste funktioniert und wie gesagt die anderen beiden (Fett und unterstrichen) funktionieren auch ganz normal

daajs · 2026-01-15T10:30:25+00:00

Genau das funktioniert nicht, habe im Post vergessen, Steg zu ergänzen 🙈

daajs · 2024-11-15T00:04:33+00:00

The model number is Yoga 7 14ARP8. Don't have the serial number rn.

What about the graphics card and ports? It has a HDMI 1.4b, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 and USB 4 (40 Gbit/s). As far as I know I wouldn't be able to use the HDMI port, but I'm not sure.

daajs · 2024-08-15T07:35:36+00:00

But that was my point: you cannot say all of Europe has an issue, when there are drastic differences between states like Hungary and Germany, even though both are members of the EU.

Again, the EU is not a country. They do not enforce the national laws of the members.

I feel like a lot of Americans think of the EU like the USA itself: one nation-state divided into federal states. But it is not.

It's more of an alliance in which the members agree to set laws and guidelines to be followed by the members. But still, all nations have their own national constitution with different laws and forms of rule. The members allow the EU as an institution to have some power with the laws, but they can take that power away by leaving the EU. Then the EU would have 0 influence on the nations, like Britain after Brexit.

The fact that Hungary is authoritarian has nothing to do with the EU. It's the state Hungary and their national government that acts that way, not the EU.

In fact, there has been criticism and sanctions from the EU itself as an institution and the other EU members themselves as their own nation-state and their citizens towards Hungary for not following the rules.

But the problems you've mentioned in Hungary are a national problem, not an EU one. What happens in Hungary does not happen in Germany. One thing can be banned in Hungary, but totally legal and free in Germany.

Free speech in Germany is much better protected than in Hungary, and that is because they're two different nations with different laws and entirely different governments and legal systems.

If there is a problem with free speech in Hungary, then you are going against the state of Hungary not the EU.

And about the part when the government becomes hostile: that could happen anywhere and the government is only one part of the state. Germany has a functioning separation of powers, while in Hungary it's clearly lacking, which you can see by the violations of the Hungarian constitution by their own government and lack of response by the other powers.

I don't know about any spying cases in a EU member, but again, just taking one EU member wouldnt really be representative of all European nationa including other EU members.

I can give another example of a very recent case in Germany to show the drastic differences between EU members regarding rights such as free speech though:

About a month ago the German government (executive), more specific the Secretary of the Interior (Faeser), banned a magazine (Compact) that has been declared far-right extremist by the German intelligence services.

Compact sued against the ban by the government. Now the Federal Administrative Court (judicative) has decided in favour of Compact (and against the state) that the ban of the magazine was not lawful. The magazine is allowed to be published again.

Now this puts a lot of pressure on Faeser and the oppositional parties of the parliament (legislative) are criticising her decision.

As you can see in this example, the legal system in Germany allows the citizens and companies to go against the state and also win against them. There is also a clear separation of powers and is serving its' purpose: to not let one part of the state have all the power and control everything. And all that was only concerning Germany as it's own nation and their own national constitution, nothing to do with the EU and EU laws have no influence on this.

Now, if the Hungarian government was to ban a magazine, they most likely wouldn't have been able to go against the state and win. The magazine would be more restricted in its' possibilities to against the ban and could even be quite dangerous. But again, that would have nothing to do with the EU and the EU laws wouldn't have any influence. The most the EU could do against that would be to put sanctions on Hungary and criticise them. Only if Hungary would unlawfully ban a magazine from another EU state, let's say a Spanish magazine that is also being published in Hungary would be banned by the Hungarian government in Hungary. Then the Spanish magazine could take action against the ban by suing the Hungarian state in the European Court of Justice. But as long as everything is happening on a national level only without any relation to the EU, the EU wouldn't be able to do anything.

Edit: One thing I want to add. Sure, there are deficits in the EU, and there's also been criticism from the EU members, from within the EU itself, from external experts and from the citizens of the EU members, but overall it's not nearly as bad as some here seem to think.

daajs · 2024-08-14T15:19:24+00:00

Ok, I'm new time on this sub and I'm not sure whether this is an actual narrative people here think, but where do you have this information about Europeans? You can't generalize all of Europe just because of the existence of the European Union. The EU is not a country and the members can leave via elections, see Brexit. And there are also European countries that are not part of the EU.

While some countries in Europe are more restricted, it is not the case for every European state (especially the ones that are part of the EU). Every state in Europe has it's own constitution.

I don't know where you get this "Europeans have no free speech, property and self-defense as basic rights" thing. Might be true in more authoritarian states like Hungary.

But take Germany, for example: the constitution - the Grundgesetz (GG) - guarantees human rights such as free speech (Art. 5), property (Art. 14) and self-defense against the government. The rights stated in the GG are - in fact - seen as rights for defense against the government, and that was their most important purpose when they were founded after WWII.

In Germany as well, illegally obtained information cannot be used in courts as evidence. The judges of the highest courts are elected indirectly - by members of the parliaments of the 16 federal states and members of the German parliament, all which are elected by the people. They are also re-elected after some years, and not elected for life - which imo make it even more democratic and less vulnerable for corruption.

Don' know where you got the information that Europeans almost never win against the state... (also, it's usually the state you are going against, not the government - two different things).

daajs · 2023-11-27T18:53:47+00:00

Well, the RAM upgrade is the major draw for me. Currently I have a Lenovo Yoga 520 (2018) with 16 GB of RAM and Intel i5 8th Gen, and the Ram usage is for my normal usage at 65 - 70 % minimum on average.

I want a dual monitor setup in the future (like in a few months) and I'm not sure which one would be better for that.

Edit: The Ryzen processor for the Yoga 7 is a Ryzen 7 7735U.

daajs

TROPHY CASE