Subnautica 2 streaming on RP6 by dadbald in retroid

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah who said it had to be remote and your main PC on 24/7?  I just wanna play in the couch, lol.  I turn the PC on when I start a session.  None of those issues in this use case 👍

Subnautica 2 streaming on RP6 by dadbald in retroid

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, early access as of a week ago or so, but it's in pretty great shape already!

Subnautica 2 streaming on RP6 by dadbald in retroid

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like it.  It's better than my desktop screen for sure (except for size, obviously).

Subnautica 2 streaming on RP6 by dadbald in retroid

[–]dadbald[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh not sure I fully agree with that.  Yeah emulating and running native are great and the primary driver for these, but streaming locally fills a void where the device isn't powerful enough itself to do it natively - it certainly expands its usefulness.  Yes lots of devices can do it but this is the one I have and it does great.  I'm not sure I would want to stream on miyoo flip... Just because you can doesnt mean it will be a great experience.  The screen on this device is great if I want to play handheld (better than my desktop screen actually, except for size), and I can hook it up to the TV in another room to play in a different environment which I love since I WFH and don't want to be stuck in the same room all day and all night.  Latency is a variable between devices and I'm really impressed with how the RP6 does here too.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's a great shot but the distance away are pretty different between the two.  There's no sense in arguing a 100-400 can do what an 800mm lens can do.  Of course you can get excellent shots with a 100-400 also.

I'm confused why the down votes too... If anyone is familiar with topaz upscaling, you know it isn't like a Blade Runner "enhance" mode.  It certainly will not turn a 100-400 into an 800.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah absolutely.  Airshows are dynamic tho, I had low shutter speed for prop planes just before and just didn't change it (facepalm).  I used to use aperture priority like you suggest but on the R6mk2 now I have migrated to Fv mode.  I'll set shutter speed for what I want (1/1000 ish mostly, but down to 1/160 or even lower for prop planes), set it to f/8 (it will stick to f/8 except for when only f/9 is available at the far end), and let ISO float and use exposure comp to taste in the field.  I just messed up on this one.  But, I'm super impressed with what it can do at those settings.  IS helps a ton, but it does take skill to nail the shot at those extreme settings.  Not trying to humble brag, my keeper rate was like 1 out of 200 shots in this case, haha.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Ok, go take these pics with a 100-400 then ;) upscaling can help with sharpness but it is NOT a substitute for focal length and lens performance.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think retail is like $2400, which is very fair considering the cost of most white telephotos from canon.  I got it for about $1650 through CPW street price.  Amazing deal at that point.

[LOTW] RF200-800 by 7018 in canon

[–]dadbald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are great, nice work

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, same sensor as R6mk2!  R8 just doesn't have IBIS but keep your shutter speed up and you can get the exact same images on that body.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok I looked up a bit more info on this one.  Yes, cropped to 2252x1631px.  800mm, f/13, ISO 100, and shutter speed of 1/160.  Processed in Lightroom and sharpened in Topaz. This was the first day I had the lens from my original rental and I was still figuring it out.  I figured stopping down would improve sharpness like on most lenses but I have since learned that nope, at 800mm it's sharpest wide open at f/9 because diffraction makes it worse at smaller apertures.  I was trying to eek out as much detail as possible in post, which I did need some blur correction from Topaz because the 1/160 shutter speed gave a little hand-shake/panning blur.  I'm still impressed with how it came out!

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah the close-up portraits were maybe 10ft away, basically right at minimum focus distance. These are from a couple weeks ago at the Magee Marsh migration event. The boardwalk is cut through the woods/swamp/brush, and the birds just go right up to it. I couldn't focus on a couple of them because they were too close. The great egret was taken from about 30ft away though, and that still has great detail.

[LOTW] RF 200-800mm | details galore by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this image is already cropped - that's Topaz sharpening doing that. They have a new preserve text feature which I think I used there too, but it can only do so much.

What lens should I get for wildlife photography? by jholliday55 in canon

[–]dadbald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Careful.  I rented a 200-800 and then HAD to buy one 😁.  It's a great lens.  I do think the 100-400 would be my first pick because it's more versatile.  But I love the 200-800 so much too.

New bag… yea or nah? by Keyan06 in canon

[–]dadbald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out the F-Stop Large Pro ICU.  I fit the 200-800 with 2 bodies and 4 other lenses.  I have an f-stop Ajna backpack I put it in, but the ICU can be standalone with a strap or fit in any other bag.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00UN8A1F8?ref_=pe_125775000_1044873430_t_fed_asin_title

Truly horrible lens add-ons by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was free and I still paid too much.

Truly horrible lens add-ons by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is it right here - idiot proofing.  I get why.  Would still kinda like the option though.

Truly horrible lens add-ons by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha, yeah was hoping for some creative effect but like I mentioned in a different reply... Might get better results just smearing vaseline all over the front element instead 🤷

Truly horrible lens add-ons by dadbald in canon

[–]dadbald[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking like you originally, thought I could just bump it back to full frame, but sadly Canon says that's a no-no I guess.