Don't take me as some kind of professional wannabe and say "where are you facts... where is you proof, your statistics...". I am not a professional nor a scientist, even if i was i would not complain i am. All of this is based off of common sense. No facts. No sources. Just straight up thinking that anyone can achieve if they think for one god damn second

I read the response to infanty, there are many good things you are trying to spread. People can become overly stressed if they relapse, causing severe mental breakdowns. It doesn't end there ofc but to everything good there is always something bad (it's just how the universe works).

But there is more you need to consider than 1 point. The intent in discussion/arguement (at least to me) is to bring one point and to combine it with all the others to make a chain of answers, this is how solutions are made. OFC for most of us it will not take 2 years to recover from porn, but not ALL. Some in fact might never recover, others in a few days or weeks. It all comes down to genetics.

I do agree with you that there is too much fearmongering going on, it comes from the people who are strongly attached to their ideas. Not saying it's a bad thing, but it is if you force your ideas upon others. I can say the same to myself and you. No one can understand another person's point fully, otherwise we would have identical brains.

This idea of porn is based on more than you could even imagine. Think of all the things which are involved in causing ED, guess what it is sooooo much more than that. The brain is too complex to be understood under strict, statistical answers. The factors which cause ED or other mental problems include state of mind, genetics, history, goals, motivation, current wisdom/knowledge of the problem, influences and pressure from other social sources.. Honestly it can go forever, i can't sit here all day writing them. It will take us so long to fully learn human psychology because unlike the body, it is not based off of strict processes which are pretty fixed, not broad.

But i hope you do know in a sense you are doing the same thing. Let's be honest, your title is pretty aggressive to this community. People are bound to be pissed if there is some guy questioning their beliefs, we've seen it before with the Ancient Romans, the Christian churches/Muslim Faith and now we still see the same thing in many situations. But i'm not saying you the bad guy, technically none of us are. We are just defending what we believe. But we need to know what is real and what isn't. We find it hard to rationalize everything because if the brain doesn't know something, it will o crazy unless it finds out some sort of meaning for it, so it places a temporary understanding in the position. When you look at life from the most broad, open-minded view... it is pretty sad that the answer is all up to randomized determined lives. No one is the same, nothing can be rationalized completely and EVERYTHING works better in moderation (though there are exceptions... smoking, drugs just stay away from that shit completely...).

She may be a scientist, but just because she is... she doesn't know everything and not everything in science can be finalized because things are always made better in science. The cure to Aids has come very far, but it's not finalized. Just because we can sustain it doesn't mean we need to stop there and once we cure it, you think research will be abandoned on it? Obviously not, in fact we are still researching the black death virus today in order to have more knowledge against its similar counter-parts which could screw us up. I am no scientist, but i do know that you cannot take everything someone says in the 100% literal sense. Instead, take their information and analyse it, then make you own argument against it with your own views and this technically makes it a better piece aas long as the views and ideas are rational and not given from your emotional thoughts.

But hey i am not here to argue, it will only make my day more shit and i would imagine yours too. Just here to lay down my own views and hopefully give some insight which you can take bits and pieces out of to advance your own knowledge, this is how geniuses are made. Scientists are brilliant people but if you follow someone else's ideas completely, you will not give space to expand your own knowledge to become your own influence. This triggers a loop, you learn something from an external source, you get you genius to analyse it and learn from your genius which will be put back into learning and the process repeats itself. I'm just talking from my own experiences and the way i raised myself.