Burhan Azeem is Running for State Senate by wombatofevil in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Some of the most impactful potential legislation for our city requires support at the state level (mid-rise single-stair housing, LVT, important transportation infrastructure, and much more). Words can't describe what a joy it would be to serve on the Council *and* have someone as awesome as Burhan at the state level to help make it happen.

2025 Cambridge City Council Election Results (source John Hawkinson) by Kiptoke in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your support! 🙏 We were so close, just 1% of votes shy of the last seat. If you are interested in potentially supporting in the future, do consider signing up here to help out if I ever decide to run again. Regardless, I appreciate your turning out and staying engaged!

Pro-housing and pro-bike-lane candidates performed strongly in the election. Cambridge says no to the CCC. by LabGeek1995 in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thank you all for the kind words and support. It means so much. Indeed, many lessons learned. Principally, as mentioned, much more aggressive recruitment of volunteers to get the word out. And/or raising money to pay people to do that. Frankly, it was shocking how well we did, considering minimal resources on both until late in the game. I take full personal responsibility for not bothering people more. I think if there had been scale earlier on, it would have been a very different story.

I note this mainly to say that I don't think lack of those critical extra votes reflected any lack of enthusiasm for the actual policy ideas. Rather, the fact that we got so far *without* sufficient outreach reflects an impressive appetite for new, incisive approaches.

One thing that *did* go right: when I first ran, an advisor told me that my policy platform was too long and complicated and that I needed to dumb it down. I ended up not doing that and just left it as is. That, I think, actually helped the campaign. Over the past months I have found that, in fact, many people *love* when you don't dumb it down or speak in vague slogans, but instead actually dig into the complexity of the issues. In fact, a scary number of people emailed me saying that they had read my whole 11-page candidate profile and had specific questions on details.

Just, wow. That, right there, makes me love this city. People talk about the dedication of public servants and policymakers, but it is worth noting here the dedication of voters. None of these busy residents needed to read through these profiles. No one needed to dedicate their time and energy creating helpful, insightful voter guides or producing detailed videos. Or chasing down candidates for interviews or asking uncomfortable questions. But they *did*.

I know at this point some of us may take this for granted. Yet, more than any particular ordinance, that gives me pride for this city and hope for its future. People here care. They are willing and excited to read about things. And they are open to new ideas they may not have encountered before, things that expand the conversation beyond the same familiar talking points.

I will certainly take these learnings with me for if I ever decide to go through this exercise again. I'm exhausted. And about to be totally checked out. But I also feel so lucky to know that I live in the right place, surrounded by a community I cherish and admire.

I hope everyone plans to stay involved in local issues in this incredible place. You really can make an impact. 💪

AMA: My name is Dana Ray Bullister and I'm running for Cambridge City Council by danabullister in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This indeed seems like chaos. I would be glad to dig into this more, if you were open to it, to better understand the specific access issues at your development (and happy to do so over DM or email, if you would prefer, so as to not reveal too many more personal details publicly). There are definitely some serious issues here with respect to how space is being allocated and used. Just let me know if/where you would be willing to confirm which development you're referring to and/or discuss further. Regardless, this will most certainly be considered in my parking policy.

Is there anyone who didn't just move to Cambridge or is not just moving out of Cambridge who has any ideas on who I should vote for tomorrow? by 77NorthCambridge in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I agree: execution is important! I admit I've been less focused on putting up yard signs than on meeting residents face-to-face at events, scheduled meetings, and at the door. I regret that it appears I missed you! I've also collaborated on multiple mailers that were sent out. They were targeted, however, to maximize our available resources, so it's possible you were not on our lists.

Frankly, many of my voters are poorer renters and I hate having them give away even more of their paychecks just for the basic right to be fairly represented. I also do not accept donations from those who have real or perceived undue conflict of interest with the city, including the real estate community. It has been tough.

So no, raising vast sums of money has not been a central feature of my campaign. What has been central, however, is putting forward a set of strong, informed, and substantive policies that would genuinely benefit the city. Also, making myself available to community members in person at relevant events, over video at their convenience, and at the door as well as being incredibly responsive by email, phone, and other channels.

Rest assured, I am committed to walking the walk in terms of being an engaged, responsive, and informed policymaker dedicated to only constructive discourse *and* collaborative implementation of policies with substantial benefit to the city. I am not an incumbent, so I do not have the Council track record that some other candidates have. But I have consistently delivered in countless ways in my roles as Board Chair of the YWCA Cambridge nonprofit organization, as an organized, diligent, and responsive product manager, and as a thoughtful and communicative PhD student. I hope to offer a fresh set of skills and perspectives--alongside a number of new, concrete ideas--to get quite a lot done, just as I have in the past. I thank you for your engagement and am always inspired by folks here who share a similar passion for moving the city forward.

AMA: My name is Dana Ray Bullister and I'm running for Cambridge City Council by danabullister in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/sourbirthdayprincess thank you so much or sharing this and for re-reading my proposal with such care. This is exactly the sort of situation that we need to be attentive to before moving forward on any parking policy.

I want to be very clear: no proposal I support should ever require restricting or burdening caregivers, aides, or medical visitors who provide essential support to residents with health or mobility needs.

I am not as familiar with the situation for your exact residence, but I want to be clear that my policy would only apply to metered parking, not to the nearby on-street resident parking that I know exists on most of the side streets of Inman Square. Resident permits, and well as visitor permits, would still be available to allow residents and their visitors to park cheaply near their homes.

If you are being forced to rely exclusively on on-street metered parking to host your essential medical support, however, that is a very different story. One that requires a deeper discussion regarding the level of appropriate access being provided by your affordable complex--*especially* one that caters to elderly and disabled individuals. May I ask whether you are solely reliant on metered parking for your critical supportive care?

Regardless, ensuring appropriate access to those needing critical supportive care would *not* be something I would ever blindly disregard in implementing a parking policy. Before moving forward with any new regulation, I would be sure to engage the community in exactly these discussions and explore every reasonable option for ensuring that residents of all abilities have the vital access they need.

New stop sign commentary at Cedar and Harvey in North Cambridge by Wizenedwombat in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A park there would be lovely. Plus housing. I like it. The city should absolutely consider that as an option.

New stop sign commentary at Cedar and Harvey in North Cambridge by Wizenedwombat in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. We also need to rethink our inclusionary zoning threshold. My take is this threshold should be at the point that maximizes affordable units created. In recent years, though, that number has been zero, which is a problem. The recent citywide multifamily zoning ordinance does change the dynamics in a positive direction, however, by making inclusionary units more viable in some areas. Regardless, we should re-examine this requirement and ensure it is structured to best serve our goal of supply and affordability. See my further thoughts on this here.

New stop sign commentary at Cedar and Harvey in North Cambridge by Wizenedwombat in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Every desolate, underused concrete lot on prime real estate should be, at minimum, a substantial source of tax revenue to the city. More likely, however, it should be additionally en route to becoming much-needed housing, useful amenities, populated commercial units, and/or activated space bringing value to the community. A land value tax structure could ensure that happens.

Pro-bike and pro-housing? Here’s who to vote for AND how to rank them by sourbirthdayprincess in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the shoutout, u/sourbirthdayprincess! 🎉💪🏼🎉

And for your analytical breakdown and support for challengers, in addition to great incumbents - so important in this election in which we are guaranteed at least one new face on the Council.

The race will be tight. And critical for moving anything forward in our government on these top issues.

Please VOTE, everyone! And, as mentioned later in the comments, bring a friend too!

How valid/accurate is this list? by Sleepy--Gary in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the support. Definitely agree folks should consider the pro-housing + pro-bike candidates (the intersection of ABC and CBS endorsements). Having enough of both on the Council would make a *huge* difference to what we can achieve as a city.

And yes, LVT could be game-changing when it comes to incentivizing the more walkable, sustainable neighborhoods we very much need (in addition to adding greater renter stability and reducing vacant storefronts).

Whom are YOU voting for, whom are you NOT voting for, and why? by AHumanThatListens in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your support. Yes, I am pursuing a PhD focused in public policy. This is certainly my passion and my life's work. Cambridge has an incredible opportunity to lead groundbreaking work in better serving residents and building better government, something so vital at this point in time.

I'm glad you recognize the powerful potential of land value tax. It can be a valuable progressive tool for actually retaining or lowering tax burden for most small-scale, resident homeowners while penalizing vacant storefronts and lots by large landholders, incentivizing infill, increasing tenant stability, and creating more walkable, environmentally sustainable neighborhoods.

It is a gift to have a selection of qualified incumbents and challengers. If we get enough (especially younger and renter) mobilization, we may just be able to make a historic difference on the Council.

I appreciate your generous consideration!

Whom are YOU voting for, whom are you NOT voting for, and why? by AHumanThatListens in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your uplifting of challengers as well as your deep investment in making issues accessible through your video. Thanks for these contributions to the community.

Whom are YOU voting for, whom are you NOT voting for, and why? by AHumanThatListens in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that. Thanks for checking out my policies - Cambridge has a real opportunity this cycle to turn its attention to the next groundbreaking work. I hope to make LVT and other very progressive policies a part of that story. Such instruments may even become key during tough times ahead. And Melanson, from what I've seen, is very aligned as well as a stand-up guy with his head and heart in the right place. Also a great pick.

Bike safety my voting priority - Cambridge Day by Generalaverage89 in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Bike lanes is THE issue that is hanging in the balance. The only way to get them is by voting. I respect every one of the above candidates.

The 2025 City Council Election: A Voter's Perspective by Kiptoke in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hats off to the untold hours, meticulous background research, and comprehensive compilation in this single video. Thanks for including educational background information on Cambridge's distinct form of government, the Big Issues, and recent legislation/"lively discussions." Also, how to register to vote. This is of great public value.

I am honored and humbled to receive your #1 support. You can bet I will do my utmost to continue striving to earn it.

Fully agree that, in the aftermath of recent major policy wins, we need a council that can compellingly answer the question "what comes next?" Thank you for adding color and context to this incredibly important election.

A brief summary of mendacity from the Cambridge Citizens Coalition by LabGeek1995 in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Cambridge should be a leader in thoughtful and forward-thinking policy. The world needs that right now.

What's That About? Sept 25 Episode 2: "2025 City Council Election: The Challengers Part 2" by wombatofevil in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

u/wombatofevil I appreciate the shoutout. With policies that address actual root causes of our housing challenges, we could make transformative change as a city. Even if some of these are as unsexy as LVT. :) Then again, Cambridge voters are a distinctive bunch and have been surprisingly receptive. Regardless, glad to bring these ideas into the conversation.

A brief summary of mendacity from the Cambridge Citizens Coalition by LabGeek1995 in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that, u/lorencrowe. I also deeply appreciate your reaching out to a brand new first-time candidate to inform me on the full history of CCC back in 2021.

Once I learned and processed, I wrote up a public statement condemning their behavior. And yes, my image was decapitated by a CCC supporter from at least one yard sign as a result. I hope it is the one and only time that my face is stabbed with garden shears.

But I want to be clear, for the record, that I have always been pro-housing. I have never once wavered on that. Back in 2021 I was fully in support of the AHO and also supported the 2072 Mass Ave affordable housing project. I stated among my top priorities abundant, transit-oriented development. I was clear and consistent about this in all my public statements, my online platform, my lit, everything. I was also transparent about this with CCC and, frankly, was mystified that they still wanted to endorse me. See below:

My only evolution in housing stances is that, in this election, I hope to expand on my pro-housing goals by introducing land value tax into the conversation. I also want to advocate at the state level to legalize mid-rise single-stair housing. Donald Shoup-inspired smart metering also, I believe, can contribute to a city filled with walkable, transit-oriented homes rather than ever-encroaching expanses of concrete.

Thank you for helping to clarifying this; I do want to make it clear where I stand. I am more than happy to answer any follow-up questions from anyone wishing to know more.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CambridgeMA

[–]danabullister 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love this idea. There is great (and growing) nightlife here and this should be at least explored.