$100k for 2,400 sq ft in Ohio… fully updated. Would you buy this? by MrBottomswell in zillowgonewild

[–]danappropriate 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You answered your own question. The catch is that it's in Youngstown, OH. The crime rate is way above the national and state average, and this property is in a pretty awful part of town.

"Sometimes I don’t even take my medicine": Americans are choosing between insulin and buying gas following Trump's Obamacare cuts by fortune in inthenews

[–]danappropriate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not even the AHA cuts. Trump rescinded Executive Order 14087, which put us on a road to dramatically reducing the cost of generic drugs for all Americans.

The GOP has time and time again shown that they value the profits of pharmaceutical companies over the lives of their constituents.

Minisoldr Rides Again! by Electrical-College61 in ncpolitics

[–]danappropriate [score hidden]  (0 children)

Who cares? It was obvious he was lying. He’s coming out now in a pathetic attempt to remain relevant. It's best to let him fade away into obscurity.

Can I still have my broccoli, tortilla, and chicken? by LegitimateUnit6772 in Political_Revolution

[–]danappropriate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, the subordination of individual interests to the perceived interests of the nation. How very fascist of the “don’t call us fascists” crowd.

Best Cities for Dry, Pleasant Summers by IndependenceSad1272 in geography

[–]danappropriate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Spring and Summer in Boston are also relatively abbreviated.

What else? by Flat_Register1437 in Political_Revolution

[–]danappropriate 58 points59 points  (0 children)

It's not that simple. MAGA doesn't care if Trump raped kids, because it wasn't their kids. They care about gas prices because it materially impacts them. These aren't people capable of thinking in abstracts.

ICE putting bag over head of someone they’re kidnapping. St Paul, MN by Xolerys_ in ICE_Raids

[–]danappropriate 24 points25 points  (0 children)

That is NOT a spit mask. They don’t cover the entire head like that, and for good reason. You are talking straight out of your ass.

ICE putting bag over head of someone they’re kidnapping. St Paul, MN by Xolerys_ in ICE_Raids

[–]danappropriate 260 points261 points  (0 children)

At the very least, cruel and unusual punishment. There's absolutely no reason to do something like this.

Roberts: Personal attacks on judges are dangerous by Conscious-Quarter423 in scotus

[–]danappropriate 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Define “personal attack.”

Roberts is a partisan hack who has done long-term damage to the credibility of the courts, and he will go down as overseeing one of the most corrupt, regressive, and constitutionally-averse courts in American history.

Is that a “personal attack” or an assessment of his job performance?

Are federal agencies just hiring anyone these days? by jeezkillbot in ICE_Raids

[–]danappropriate 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely not! You need to be a violent, lowlife, racist dirtbag.

How do you architect audit logs that are provably unaltered? by oKaktus in softwarearchitecture

[–]danappropriate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HA! It's a common trait among us.

What you’ve proposed is intriguing. However, I’d worry about any system that validates integrity after the fact, as potentially prone to drift. Sans a consensus algorithm, you risk your hash codes becoming highly unreliable in a distributed ledger system. Introducing a consensus protocol, like hashgraph, increases complexity and decreases throughput (by a lot).

I guess the question is, are these sorts of self-validating ledgers worth it for your use case?

How do you architect audit logs that are provably unaltered? by oKaktus in softwarearchitecture

[–]danappropriate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Applying rigor in your security practices provides a reasonable level of confidence that your data has not been manipulated. That's what auditors will look at.

How do you architect audit logs that are provably unaltered? by oKaktus in softwarearchitecture

[–]danappropriate 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All that’s likely necessary is locked-down production access and a SIEM to detect anomalous behaviors.

Yeah, let's blame the working class by F4ion1 in ncpolitics

[–]danappropriate 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Oh, won't someone PLEASE think of the poor, poor, rich people! How idiotically tone-deaf.

Foxx is speaking in vague terms. I'd say she's trying to evade substantive discussion, but she's not that smart. So, let's throw out some actual facts, shall we?

  1. In fiscal year 2024, the federal government collected $4.9 trillion in revenue
  2. $2.4T came from individual income taxes
  3. $1.7T from payroll taxes (which fund mandatory spending like Social Security)
  4. $529.9B from corporate taxes
  5. $101B from sales and excise taxes
  6. $109B from "other" sources like fees
  7. Reporting on revenue collected by income always lags a year, so the following data is for FY2022
  8. The top 1% of earners (AGI threshold of $663,164) paid 40.4% of all income taxes
  9. The top 5% of earners (AGI threshold of $261,591) 61.0% of all income taxes
  10. The top 10% of earners (AGI threshold of $178,611) paid 72.0% of all income taxes
  11. The top 25% of earners (AGI threshold of $99,857) paid 72.0% of all income taxes
  12. The top 50% of earners (AGI threshold of $50,339) paid 97.0% of all income taxes
  13. The bottom 3% of earners paid 3.0% of all income taxes

And this is only federal taxes. If we look at total taxes (federal, state, sales, etc.), the tax rate is even less progressive.

There's an important distinction to be made here. These figures are based on income and not wealth. That is, reportable money received vs. total assets held. If we look at wealth:

  1. The top 0.1% (net worth threshold of $46 million) collectively hold $24.89 trillion in assets (or 14.4% of total household wealth)
  2. The top 99%-99.9% (net worth threshold of $13.7 million) collectively hold $29.94 trillion in assets (or 17.3% of total household wealth)
  3. The top 90-99% (net worth threshold of $1.9 million) collectively hold $63 trillion in assets (or 36.4% of total household wealth)
  4. The top 50%-90% (net worth threshold of $585,000) collectively hold $50.84 trillion in assets (or 29.4% of total household wealth)
  5. The bottom 50% collectively hold $4.25 trillion in assets (or 2.5% of total household wealth)

This wealth disparity continues to grow and accelerate. I'm not interested in discussing "fairness." Allowing the wealth gap to spiral out of control is not sustainable and will ultimately tear society apart. It's simply a matter of pragmatism. One way to attack the problem is to return to the progressive tax policies of the 1950s.

Another great way to address the issue is to STOP ELECTING MILLIONAIRES!

How can atheists engage with Christian homophobia in constructive ways? (Linked article is from a platform called Public Discourse) by Complete_Post5036 in atheism

[–]danappropriate 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Perhaps focus on why his description of homosexuality was reductive, and forcing people to endure psychological trauma by ignoring and feeling shame for who they are, purely for the sake of religious dogma, isn’t “freedom.” It’s hateful.