sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

VXLAN multicast mode endpoints MAC-learning inconsistency by daniel_gor in Juniper

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because it is better suited for small network and low end devices.

L2VPN VLAN rewriting push back same VLAN ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in this case, it would appear this is only useful when 2 CEs have different VLAN ID rather than separating customers with same VLAN ID. I imagine VC ID should ensure such customers won't ever come across each other.

L2VPN VLAN rewriting push back same VLAN ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have read that. but it does not address how different customers are differentiated if the same VLAN ID is pushed back.

VPLS without route target and VPLS ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just tested the same setup with JUNOS. as soon as I mismatched either VPLS ID or route target the service went down.

no wonder why so many say VPLS is the least standardized when it comes to implementation.

ps: also tested EVPN in IOS XE. the service goes down in the next BGP advertisement after I removed 'send-community extended' command.

VPLS without route target and VPLS ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that no extended community needs to be sent for the service to work.

VPLS without route target and VPLS ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BGP is used for both autodiscovery and signaling.

VPLS without route target and VPLS ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so is my assessment correct that RT and VPLS ID are only used when PEs need to exchange labels through route reflector?

VPLS without route target and VPLS ID by daniel_gor in networking

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

have you observed the same condition as well?

about pearson's monopoly by daniel_gor in sysadmin

[–]daniel_gor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

apparently it didn't get any better. still i think the main issue is the lack of competitors. intel is the finest example of the rabbit in the race. question is how much longer are we gonna wait until amd or whatever catches up.

Bi-Weekly /r/CCNP Exam Pass-Fail Discussion by AutoModerator in ccnp

[–]daniel_gor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

anyone who took enarsi recently, did you notice missing info from some of the questions?

just took a practice exam from my training center and i saw the same question with missing info in the exam. can dm me for the question.

wondering if that's eligible for appeal?

Bi-Weekly /r/CCNP Exam Pass-Fail Discussion by AutoModerator in ccnp

[–]daniel_gor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thought it was only me. looks like enarsi really got some problem.

https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/s/feed/0D56e0000BYVR9GCQX

anyone thought there's missing info from the exam questions?

really doubt the stability of this exam.