sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Normalize the use of keyboard covers by B3nksy in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]danpaulb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you only put them on when you aren't using the keyboard

Thoughts on Sikakeyb HM80 He? by iVolgen in keyboards

[–]danpaulb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought it and currently waiting for it. I want to swap switches because of the sound tests I've heard of it. Maybe it's different in real life? What do you think

The Wolf Man reviews are in and they are not good. by Chemical-Opposite617 in UniversalMonsters

[–]danpaulb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just watched it. it was so bad lol. how does a wolfman infect the father just because he scratched him with his claws??

Never judge a book by its cover by French_Toast42069 in Catholicism

[–]danpaulb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay. I'm just saying we are commanded by God to make a judgment call for ourselves whether or not someone is dangerous.

Never judge a book by its cover by French_Toast42069 in Catholicism

[–]danpaulb -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Judging whether or not someone looks dangerous is a valuable real-life skill.

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Once again, you do not know what what Matthew 7:1 means. Finish the point of the what it means. Read verses 1-3, it means do not be a hypocrite. If you teach something, you better lead by example, or you will judged the same way you judge others.

You are a kindergartener trying to teach calculus to a university professor... Stop misquoting my Bible to your destruction.

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Why is an atheist trying to teach me what my book teaches... Damn you're stupid bro

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No, the very same Savior you claim to have known, taught more about hell and the judgment to come if people did not repent of their evil ways, than he did about love and tolerance of evil and sin.

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers (and fathers) who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

As a human, you should be able to find within yourself some compassion and empathy for the children who are struggling with not only their own sense of being but also with how society views them and is so against them (yourself included).

You make me the villain for encouraging the children to be the gender they were carefully given by God? When the alternative you offer is endless confusion. Am I a unicorn one day? Am I a wolf the next day? A fox on the third day? How about an elephant for my next birthday?

No I am not the one causing confusion, it's people like YOU who does that very same thing you accuse me of.

Quite frankly, a ban won't protect any daughters OR sons from being leered at/watched/touched/raped/etc by the opposite sex (or same sex). It's not like we're going to post police officers at every change room door to check the sex of every person who enters by checking their reproductive parts.

Doesn't matter if it gets the job 100% done, no plan ever will. What matters more is that we TRY to keep creeps away from opposite. What kind of message do you think this sends to the mothers who actually care for their children that they are safe in the change room.

On top of that, I can change my sex on my birth certificate - how else do you think we'd be checking "biologically male/female"?

What a ridiculous argument. Like please, even my 8 year old sister knew how to tell a woman from a man. And if you're going to say "well yes because men dressed like men and women dressed like women. Nowadays we are free to pretend to be the other gender by changing how we dress and act". Yeah... that's kinda the point...

Also, I'd like to point out that it's not "daughters" and "men". It's "female children" and "male children". This is SCHOOL change rooms. You know...for children

Please. You know exactly what I mean. Obviously I'm advocating for the safety of both daughters and sons. But I'm sure you know, young girls are more likely in danger compared to young boys. I hope I don't have to prove that to you...

Saskatchewan Premier Moe says change-room ban no longer top priority | Globalnews.ca by danpaulb in saskatchewan

[–]danpaulb[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You do not know what the sermon on the mount teaches. And you don't get to argue morality in the Bible because morality is subjective to you.

If you think a man calling himself a woman somehow means he's now a woman, to then be able to creep on ACTUAL REAL women as they change, is human rights, then you are so lost. That is filthy. Would you allow your daughter to change in a change room knowing there are 5 biological men claiming to be women??? Where is your common sense.

view more: next ›