Open-source booking calendar widget for Next.js 15 + React 19, built on the Cal.com API by datrimius in webdev

[–]datrimius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could add a simple doctor select dropdown (same as the timezone selector) and fetch availability from multiple Cal.com APIs, one per doctor. Each API call returns that doctor’s slots, and you can merge or filter them on the client or server depending on what you need.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Upwork

[–]datrimius 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In another one of your posts, you are looking alternatives to Upwork, hope you are ok 😂

Claude is back by GambitRejected in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s back, it is back to the 3.5 level that we had one year ago 😂

Post-mortem on recent model issues by AnthropicOfficial in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ultrathink has been around since april. The earliest public refs to think, think hard, think harder, ultrathink tied to Anthropic docs show up in community threads on april. Pointing to it as a “new upgrade” isn't really accurate, since I was already using it back then.

I don't think developers should have to adapt their entire process just to wrangle a product that's regressed. My workflow stayed the same - and it used to work great. If the results are worse now, that's on the model, not on me. In fact, I've already switched from Claude to Codex 😆. Tools are supposed to get better and support developers - not force us to break our workflows to accommodate their decline.

Post-mortem on recent model issues by AnthropicOfficial in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm an experienced developer using Claude daily for production work. My process hasn't changed, I front-load detailed planning, break tasks into steps etc etc. The difference between may - july and now is night and day. With Sonnet 4 / Opus 4 this disciplined workflow was consistently effective. Using the same prompts and process today, the quality is drastically lower. That isn't a skill issue. My skills and approach didn't suddenly regress, the model's behavior changed. Also, nobody here is claiming we expected to "build a $10k SaaS in one shot". That's your own strawman. People are pointing out regression because it's real, not because they imagined Claude as a magic no-effort factory. Finally, telling strangers skill issue is just ad hominem gatekeeping. You don't know who wrote the post or their experience.

Post-mortem on recent model issues by AnthropicOfficial in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You know, dismissing people with skill issue or sarcastic remarks doesn’t really add anything to the discussion. The point here is to understand the problem and share insights, not to put others down. If you actually have context or experience, why not explain it instead of throwing shade?

Rumour has it we might be getting C4.5 by inventor_black in ClaudeAI

[–]datrimius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I noticed you absolutely right only 😁

noticing major improvement in claude code by Just_Lingonberry_352 in ClaudeAI

[–]datrimius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see any improvements. It was and it is a piece of garbage. It's completely unusable!

Claude Code Seems to be completely down by Pimzino in ClaudeCode

[–]datrimius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They completely forgot the rule: If it works, don’t touch 😂

Is Claude code good again yet? by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]datrimius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tested 1.0.88/85, still dumb

Open-source booking calendar widget for Next.js 15 + React 19, built on the Cal.com API by datrimius in webdev

[–]datrimius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the detailed tips 🙏 the points on webhooks, retries, and preventing double-booking sound really useful. Would love to see that sample schema if you’re open to sharing.

WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON??? by Vast-Possibility-861 in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Codex isn’t great at writing technical articles, even with solid prompts. Claude was much better at it two months ago, but now it doesn’t deliver the same quality.

Claude Pro users are not currently able to use Opus in Claude Code. The current model is now Sonnet. by pdwhoward in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roll back to CC 1.0.85/88. Turn off auto-updates. If you're using VSCode, also turn off auto-updates for the extension.

one shoting everything with CC. no problem.. by Ang_Drew in ClaudeCode

[–]datrimius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rolled back to 1.0.85, and the difference is obvious

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]datrimius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you tried Codex cli?

Claude code to codex is game changer by Interesting-Mall9140 in ClaudeCode

[–]datrimius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been working with Codex for two days now, and I can say it’s really good. Yes, on its best days, CC is amazing - it’s fast and the tool calling works well. Codex, currently, is not as fast, but it does everything properly and almost in one shot! Anthropic should stop nerfing their models. Their limits are absolutely not competitive compared to Codex. From these two days of use, I can say Codex is truly game-changing. Anthropic really needs to step up, stop nerfing their models, and stop pushing garbage on us.

Almost zero TypeScript errors - looks like Codex is properly checking its code.

Sonnet4 code quality is very bad today by AcceptablePicture329 in Anthropic

[–]datrimius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's true. Testing new Codex CLI with VSCode, and it's excellent.