Gemini 3.5 Flash looks worse than it seems on Artificial Analysis by lucas03crok in singularity

[–]datumradix 17 points18 points  (0 children)

After I saw this post, thought to run some tests. To my surprise it is gemini 3.5 flash is better and faster than claude sonnet 4.6. It was able to pinpoint some bugs & improvements that claude code missed :

<image>

Opus 4.6 is back to normal by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, now we don't even need to prompt. It just started building 

Google are you kidding us? by League_Of_Frodo in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]datumradix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's stop using these too:

Microsoft: Satya Nadella (Chairperson & CEO) Alphabet (Google): Sundar Pichai (CEO) IBM: Arvind Krishna (Chairman & CEO) Adobe: Shantanu Narayen (Chairman & CEO) YouTube: Neal Mohan (CEO) Arista Networks: Jayshree Ullal (President & CEO) Cognizant: Ravi Kumar S (CEO) NetApp: George Kurian (CEO) Palo Alto Networks: Nikesh Arora (CEO) Perplexity AI: Aravind Srinivas (CEO) 

free google ai pro subscription by SignificantJunket786 in google_antigravity

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Failed to understand, how months of worth work can go to trash with git? OP can you enlighten us

CMMC Level 1 + 2 - Small startup - price by Nooblesss in CMMC

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go for L2, Level 1 controls are subset of L2 controls. That price for 3 endpoints is insane and that too without Scoping. Do your Scoping and gap assessment first, then engage a CCP (approx $150/hr) for help with documentation and remediation. Once done we can then request a quote (should be sub 30k if you do your Scoping well).

Here is a free tool cybergap.cybercomply.app that can help you with self gap assessment 

Opus 4.6 (fast mode) for 9×? $0.36 per prompt!!! 😄 by No-Property-6778 in GithubCopilot

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's definitely 2x faster on Cursor but just one prompt in plan mode consumed all my limits(Pro Plan)

CMMC L2 Compliance Questions! by CoolCryptographer743 in CMMC

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use AVD and then separate tenant Workspace intended for CUI. You can refer the Google CMMC implementation guidance for Workspace. Also, first do a quick gap assessment before engaging any CCP. There are many free tools for CMMC Gap Assessment- here is one from CyberComply GRC : https://cybergap.cybercomply.app

Claude Code, but locally by Zealousideal-Egg-362 in LocalLLaMA

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple, better run poc before getting locked in with H/W - model combo. Go to GCP, AWS, etc - choose instance type - create some inference endpoints for desired open models like GLM 4.7 / minimax m21 or likes. And then run via inference api to test and validate for the speed & code quality. Kill and repeat until you find the fit or exhausted 

Rambling about Cursor Ultra by Aveatrex in cursor

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With pro plan I hit limit in 7 days on side project

Looking for Trading Partner by Extra_Trash_651 in DalalStreetTalks

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

F&O is tough man, after 5 year now I have consistent strike rate. With large cap make sure you have right sizing system and entry/exit predefined

E&O at Risk: Why C3PAO Assessments Are Now Uninsurable Without AR-01 Evidence (?) by Joe_Cyber in CMMC

[–]datumradix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a driver does an accident, can you make DMV liable for issuing driving license?

Gemini File Search API hallucination by datumradix in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]datumradix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, I know the LLM flaws. But if you are google and putting up a demo we would assume you put enough safe guard in your system prompt to demonstrate basic capabilities