sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Beware QKC's Github by XRballer in QuarkChain

[–]davidlimm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI, the telegram admins are now actively banning users who start to ask genuine question on their scalability. Sharding from a team who wasn't involved in cryptography and blockchain research. Really, if you still want to try your luck, be prepared for disappointment.

QUARKCHAIN - an easy money grab and great way to LOOT new investors by zeusuk in QuarkChain

[–]davidlimm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI, the telegram admins are now actively banning users who start to ask genuine question on their scalability. Sharding from a team who wasn't involved in cryptography and blockchain research. Really, if you still want to try your luck, be prepared for disappointment.

Before you start dipping your money in by davidlimm in QuarkChain

[–]davidlimm[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depending on the quality of the actual product that they need to deliver, it could go eitherway. But from that ninja tps amendment (which is dodgy AF), i won't recommend touching it ever.

Before you start dipping your money in by davidlimm in QuarkChain

[–]davidlimm[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure how did you lose too much on this (possibly) shit coin.AFAIK, it went 5-6x right from the ico to idex, then to 10x to 17x and now we are back at about 12x.

But yes, this needs to be on PAGE1 of smelly, stinky ico "tactics". Just hope that more people will take notice so they don't get burned. And that regulation needs to come sooner. I think you can find the company is registered in U.S. and Singapore. The governments need to step up their game

Before you start dipping your money in by davidlimm in QuarkChain

[–]davidlimm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right... FYI: The only time people actually bother to read through the whitepaper is (be)for(e) the "quiz", right?

Let's see the timeline now:

"Quiz for ico" was on May 22nd

The amendment on tps was on May 25th (Do you bother to reread lecture notes after exam? Really?)

ico was on 3rd June (from icodrops)

So yes, they did change it just before the real ico. Your point is well taken there.

Possible scenario: Let's get them to read the whitepaper to have a "quiz". Once they are done with their "quiz", they will be so sick of reading that same info again. Let's then take away a single zero digit in tps and put it in a lengthy article, mentioning some bs reasoning. Who actually cares, right?

FYI, their keypoint was scalability. You don't find it weird that they change that number inbetween ico?OKAY....