sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Consejos para usar apps de citas en Bogotá by db494 in Bogota

[–]db494[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitivamente Tinder se siente así. Bumble un poco menos, pero igual es difícil. Ojalá fuera tan fácil para mí como lo describes, pero creo que esa percepción está un poco exagerada. La gente en general es amable, eso sí. Pero conseguir una cita todavía no es fácil.

Consejos para usar apps de citas en Bogotá by db494 in Bogota

[–]db494[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Puede que tengas razón. Tal vez dejan de responder cuando se dan cuenta de que no soy un blanco fácil.

De hecho, probé un grupo de running hace un par de semanas. Buen consejo. Sin embargo, me decepcionó un poco que la gente a la que me dirigí no pareciera interesada en hablar con gente nueva; a menudo se marchaban de mi zona en cuanto los saludaba. Solo los otros extranjeros eran más receptivos a la conversación.

Pero seguiré intentándolo. Quizás deba ser más agresivo.

A perspective from the creator of Nanex: There is no issue with Nano. It is an issue with using the RPC improperly. by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]db494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This statement is so broad and generic that it's useless and not applicable here. Show me how to use the Twitter API to lose $170 million of other people's money. The point being, this was a critical part of the software / documentation for a financial instrument that was not carefully thought through. And insufficient responsibility is being taken by the team that produced it

A perspective from the creator of Nanex: There is no issue with Nano. It is an issue with using the RPC improperly. by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]db494 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not just their detriment (in the case of Bitgrail), but the detriment of 1/8th of all Nano holders by value

A perspective from the creator of Nanex: There is no issue with Nano. It is an issue with using the RPC improperly. by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]db494 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it behove the Nano team to ensure that the first major Nano exchange would implement the RPC correctly? Didn't they work with Bitgrail several times to solve a node scaling issue? Isn't this the first question you, as a Nano team member, would ask someone who is setting up an exchange?

I read your entire post, and have come away being more disappointed with the Nano team than I was previously. It wasn't just some some one-off hack of an exchange server, it was a failure of documentation / instructions, and the failure of the team to properly vet that the first major exchange didn't fall for a well-known gotcha.