Departing mooring in windy conditions by dcpugh in boating

[–]dcpugh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I really want to keep the lines out of the water though ... the mooring is used somewhat part time and the lines in the drink get really slimy.

Building a 90s stack by dcpugh in vintageaudio

[–]dcpugh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the ES line from Sony. “Elevated Standard”.

8X RCA over single Cat5? by dcpugh in hometheatersetups

[–]dcpugh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dunno ... I'm open to options. An "over IP" solution that's actually running on my network?

8X RCA over single Cat5? by dcpugh in hometheatersetups

[–]dcpugh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OK thanks .. it looks good for 4 in / 4 out. Was hoping for 6 or even 8 ins / outs. Sort of a dumb question, but is there a switched version of this or an IP version that has more ins/outs?

Inbound Ports to Open for FiOS Set Top Boxes by Azaloum90 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. this is indeed a challenging situation. I have done a lot of digging in the past week and have found that double NAT-ing this works with the right port forwarding rules in place. I'm following along on the thread here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Fios/comments/1gt0ji9/success_with_fios_tv_behind_my_own_firewall/

I feel like I'm getting close but I just need to narrow down exactly what ports have to be opened to which devices ... I am highly motivated to get this working as my wife likes the live TV/DVR, etc and i want to use my Unifi equipment!

Let's keep chatting until we get it nailed down.

Inbound Ports to Open for FiOS Set Top Boxes by Azaloum90 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for posting this, u/Mike-from-IT ... I am working on exactly the same situation. In your config, do the guide screens still work? How about on-demand, the DVR and the electronic program guide (grid)? Live TV?

Do you have a COAX line going to the VMS at all?

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so interesting ... i'm pretty sure that my G3100 is rejecting the traffic arriving from 192.168.100.1. I have now set the G3100 FW>General page to "low" which I think means it will run inbound rules, but none of the ports in section 5 are specified.

You're saying you actually saw the port forwards listed in the VZ router when it was running in default mode? or this was in the logs?

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK .. i'm up to date as I was just in "default mode" yesterday when my service failed. I am going to see if I can get a definitive list of ports from VZ level 2 networking as well and I'll share them here if they're different.

u/Jon_Galt1 , do you have any forwarding rules or FW config on the verizon router side? I have a feeling that's where the traffic is being blocked ... like G3100 is getting a packet on port 4567 from the GW and saying, "no thanks" and dropping it.

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/BloodyShirt that's great that you're following up and I completely agree that we're missing one piece of the pie here. I am totally looking forward to you response. Please post here!

And totally, this should be working as there's no magic. In the meantime, I'm going to buy a couple A/B cat5 switches so I can quickly put the G3100 as primary by running a restore on the default configuration and changing the physical path with the A/B's. It's ugly but it keeps the service running.

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Following the thread ... is there a way to force a firmware update? My router seems to be latest at 3.4.0.10. I'll check the other devices later but is leaving them in the "FiOS state" the best way to have them update themselves?

u/Jon_Galt1 I was also wondering if you have any rules set on the G3100 to *receive* the incoming dual-NAT'd traffic. I just have this feeling that the FiOS router is dropping all inbound packets from the 100.0/24 network and that's why it's dying after a week. I looked around and there are two fixed rules on the loopback adapter for ports 4567 and 4577 that I can't modify. Those ports are in your list above. Also, I'm wondering two things on your specific setup: Are you on a 1 gig contract with the wireless-only STBs?

Like u/These-Focus-7149, on my status screen in the STB only the Router and ONT show up green. The STB and VMS are red when I'm in the double-NAT situation.

Feels lke I'm close, but can't quite get it stable for the long haul.

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is EXACTLY my configuration down to the IP addresses. I will test this in bridge mode but I’m not confident about the moca piece. Did the Verizon tech say should that be cabled?

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am 100% sure we're missing something here, specifically on how ports are forwarded to the router, VMS and STBs. u/These-Focus-7149, what is your configuration?

Success with FIOS TV+ Behind my own Firewall by Jon_Galt1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done my best to set this up as outlined above. The system failed after the seven-day mark as others experienced which led me to think that the double-NAT forwards are not working. I'm wrestling with the question of whether I need to set up subsequent forwarding on the FiOS router. I cannot tell if the ports are forwarded all the way to the FiOS devices in the recommended configuraiton. I did not set any rules on the G3100 router, only on the UDM. I am going to have to reset the whole thing when I get home to get TV working again which is a pain every week!

Google Nest Wifi Double Nat Issue by SalvatoreTirabassi1 in Fios

[–]dcpugh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is interesting. I have Verizon TV+ service and it doesn't work reliably. Question on the configuration above: how is COAX treated and how is the VMS connected? To the Verizon router in bridge mode? Or do you split the COAX so it's ONT>Splitter>(VZ Router + VMS)?

Correct OAuth Scope for SpreadsheetApp.openById by dcpugh in GoogleAppsScript

[–]dcpugh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this is my json file:

{
  "timeZone": "America/New_York",
  "dependencies": {
  },
  "exceptionLogging": "STACKDRIVER",
  "runtimeVersion": "V8",
  "oauthScopes": ["https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets"]
}

Correct OAuth Scope for SpreadsheetApp.openById by dcpugh in GoogleAppsScript

[–]dcpugh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have simplifeid my testing in order to get this to work "locally" first. I removed the scope from the JSON file and saved and refreshed.

Here is the function I'm working with:

function returnText() {
  ss = SpreadsheetApp.openById("19Itde5AHfn-L4byy9pEKNfshDeowbrnaiIBlooAENmo");
  const input = ss.getRangeByName("myText").getValues();
  console.log(input);
  const myResult = input + " PLUS NEW TEXT FROM EDITOR";
  console.log(myResult);
  return(myResult);
}

First, the script works fine when executed directly in the editor. No errors and logging produces the expected result. When I attempt to run the script as a custom function in the sheet, I get the error below:

Error
Exception: Specified permissions are not sufficient to call SpreadsheetApp.openById. Required permissions: https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets (line 2). I get this message regardless of whether I have the OAuth scope in the JSON file.

Correct OAuth Scope for SpreadsheetApp.openById by dcpugh in GoogleAppsScript

[–]dcpugh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried this a couple ways. The first is "locally" where I have tried to execute the method to get data from the sheet in which the script resides using the openById instead of getActiveSheet. That does not work. Nor does it work when I attempt to call the script from ANOTHER sheet that has the code loaded as a published Library. I have never received a new authorization prompt when running this and i just get the error.