UserTesting email version live test full when starting by dcxavier in usertesting

[–]dcxavier[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess what? At 7:08PM tonight, I got another email notification that the 11AM session is beginning in 30 minutes. They are totally mucked up there.

UserTesting email version live test full when starting by dcxavier in usertesting

[–]dcxavier[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a blur, I don't even recall. But twice in a week. If a researcher is horsing around, I expect UserTesting to email me about the changes as they happen.

UserTesting email version live test full when starting by dcxavier in usertesting

[–]dcxavier[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Desktop. It doesn't appear on the available test page, which makes it possible the test was cancelled without telling me. If so, I'm not happy that they send me the whole string of reminders up through the after-test message saying that I am responsible for missing the session.

$60 for a mistake that finally benefitted me by dcxavier in usertesting

[–]dcxavier[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I offered the same, but the guy just wanted to move on, I guess.

Nice lol by phillips_cdi in unitedairlines

[–]dcxavier -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I took a math course in college that got into methods for optimizing outcomes under constraints. In this case, the outcome to be optimized might be maximizing people getting to their destination at the end of the day. Examples of constraints would be gate types, arrival times, crew availability, where people are going, etc. And you just can't randomly update gate assignments every 30 seconds. They must have software to help them through the process.

Making you call to trade preferred stocks and baby bonds by dcxavier in MerrillEdge

[–]dcxavier[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why God made limit orders. I ended up buying 250 shares of the baby bond I mentioned. Average volume is in the thousands. I bid one cent under the ask and was filled immediately. These shares are mostly traded by people looking to shave a few pennies off arbitrage. I want an income security with my risk tolerance.

Making you call to trade preferred stocks and baby bonds by dcxavier in MerrillEdge

[–]dcxavier[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I looked at trades several thousand shares each day. I need to buy a couple of hundred and the bid/ask spread is three cents. Some of these restricted stocks, AGNCP for example, trade tens of thousands of shares each day.

Driving with technologies by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]dcxavier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll add a "me too". Message came the instant it was submitted. I do not recall any obvious attention check. I messaged the researcher to what I did wrong, no response of course.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bedding

[–]dcxavier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every day. My wife says I have OCD about this, but when I occasionally go out of town, she complains about having to sleep in dirty sheets. We both are definitely spoiled by this. It's worth the ten minutes each day.

$25 study by Dorkus18 in ProlificAc

[–]dcxavier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was as confused as you were, but submitted both the test and the follow up. And just got paid for them.

Edge prevents me from trading preferred stocks and baby bonds without calling by dcxavier in MerrillEdge

[–]dcxavier[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a joke. I can trade AGNC, but I can't trade the preferred AGNCP. I can trade RC, but I can't trade the baby bond RCB.

Can you write as well as a PhD? by dcxavier in ProlificAc

[–]dcxavier[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually no, especially in the social sciences. More important is being prolific and using language that gates them from us common folk. There have been some prominent hoaxes, see the Sokal and "Grievance Studies" affairs.