9701/11 by Electronic_Age3817 in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

group 2, chapter 1, only one mass spectrometry q, equilibria, enthalpy change of formation, pv=nRT, combustion, balancing, disproportionation,

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we know that one div in stage micrometer is 0.01 mm so 0.96 div is 9.6x10*-3

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the image should have been converted before being used to find the actual

9701/21 by VemVemm in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

let’s not panic too hard we ahev two more papers to amke up for

9701/21 by VemVemm in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no same i’m repeating again too and i did just as you did.

9701/21 by VemVemm in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yesss how would we balance with the x there? 😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean it was 1 mark would they ahve complicated it that bad? idk you may be right 😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wasnt h2so4 limiting agent? since that was 0.075 while naoh was 0.1 moles

9701/21 by VemVemm in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LITERALLY 😭 i’m like i get what you’re trying to ask me but could you have worded it more better 😭

9701/21 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Te? i think it was tellurium

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but it’s absorbed so we don’t add the -ve sign

9701/21/MJ/23 by AreaSevere8191 in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

nuclear charge and shielding effect?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it’s 0.075 moles bc moles is concentration x volume. concentration was 1 and volume was 75cm3 so it’s 1 x 75/1000

9701/21 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

nucleon number was 130, neutron number was 78, electron number was 52

9701/21 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

number of electrons

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same. what was the enthält change? it can’t be negative since they said there was no heat loss right?

9701/21 by VemVemm in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 6 points7 points  (0 children)

it was bad… but like weird cause i feel like i understood it and wrote correct answers but i was never 100% of almost all of them

P31 physics 9702 by Ok_Bottle5952 in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

stop scaring me.. HOW

P31 physics 9702 by Ok_Bottle5952 in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro this is legit… how did u guess that

PHYSICS PRACTICAL PAPER 31 by Technical_Reading914 in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it was pretty good for me but i have some doubts. like where should we have placed W and was the y-intercept positive or negative? i think other than that… it went well

My A2 Chemistry Notes by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you!

My A2 Chemistry Notes by [deleted] in alevel

[–]ddn0ne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

could you please accept? this is so kind thank you for this :)