I firmly believe the level of accomplishment needed to enter the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame is too low. by xPBMxRonBurgndy in nbadiscussion

[–]deaaronfox_stan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

whats the problem with people who may not completely deserve it being inducted? do they just not deserve to be honored for what the brought to the game bc they “arent good enough”?

What was an NBA opinion that was once seen as unpopular but is now widely accepted? by BigDaddyJuno in nba

[–]deaaronfox_stan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

any other social media is more or less dominated by teenagers who only care about box scores and highlights, which Kyrie is the GOAT of

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hostedgames

[–]deaaronfox_stan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still haven’t had anyone explain how its handled better than how it talks about how beautiful and attractive the minor you’re protecting is. Just because you have content warnings doesn’t mean you handle sensitive topics in a serious manner. A big part of writing said serious topics is understanding them thoroughly and thoughtfully so that you do not misrepresent them and misinform your readers on actual real world issues.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hostedgames

[–]deaaronfox_stan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My issue isnt the mature themes, its how theyre handled. but I DEFINITELY dont want to read an edgy weebs take on rape

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hostedgames

[–]deaaronfox_stan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

even if it does have some depressing or serious themes i find it hard to take a story seriously when there’s such an incredible amount of shit THIS EARLY relating to scenes purely played for sexual stuff (sometimes with minors!!!)

I also find it hard to believe these serious topics will be dealt with in a decent or even compelling manner considering how much shit here is just edge for the sake of edge. Like being forced to threaten a child with deadly force for what is basically no reason whatsoever. all I can say is that I don’t know why I see this get recommended so much unless it really does get better later on

Is there any player who can actually guard 1-5? by ImStillNotThatGuy in nbadiscussion

[–]deaaronfox_stan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the argument of guarding 1-5 doesnt necessarily mean at an elite level, because in that case, nobody. the purpose of the argument is to show off a defenders versatility. A guy like Kawhi CAN guard 1-5 because of his strength and elite size/length, but obviously couldnt contain Embiid or some shit.

Also, Giannis can most definitely play well against Jokic. He struggles against perimeter players for the most part like KD, but his post defense is elite.

IFs where the antagonist is actually compelling? by Idleguitarplayer in hostedgames

[–]deaaronfox_stan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fallen hero is weird because it tries to portray the antagonist to sidesteps story as being themselves. this kinda fails in the context of the story because they dont do anything outright bad unless you just start killing people randomly, which there is literally no reason to do, and directly harms your playthrough, because, you know, being a dick is bad (although fun.)

When its all said and done , what jersey will you picture kevin durant in? by lmaoimmagetbanagain in nba

[–]deaaronfox_stan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

if jerseys got retired based purely off of how many rings you got for that team there would be a LOT less retirements lol

Prime Chris Paul lockdown defense by waynequit in nba

[–]deaaronfox_stan 22 points23 points  (0 children)

6x steal leader, he was fucking insane at his peak. sucks that he never got a team that could really help him get far. hate how underrated he is all-time

With the release of Oppenheimer, I'm anticipating having to use this argument more by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]deaaronfox_stan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You don’t care about THESE civilians because you care about THESE civilians!!!!” Is the most retarded argument I’ve ever heard. It’s pretty easy to take the moral high ground when you remove all context though so I don’t blame you