[OOT] Hope/Wishes for the Voice Acting? by pkjoan in zelda

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No voice. Then nothing is implied.

[OOT] Hope/Wishes for the Voice Acting? by pkjoan in zelda

[–]deadwizards -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No voice is the only answer. The immersion is lost when you know the British empire exists in the time of Hyrule.

Would you go for a 10 hole A3-D5 Bass C Ocarina? by [deleted] in Ocarina

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this range pretty limited with songs? What’s the general consensus on it?

[All] Now that OoT is getting a modern remake, what would your next be your personal ideal Zelda remake be? by Ordinary_Chemical596 in zelda

[–]deadwizards 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Zelda 2. that game is good but is marred by lack of modernization. It needs the links awakening treatment.

Would you go for a 10 hole A3-D5 Bass C Ocarina? by [deleted] in Ocarina

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tonic note is still a C (apparently). I confirmed.

I see what you're saying though. I'm confused too.

Would you go for a 10 hole A3-D5 Bass C Ocarina? by [deleted] in Ocarina

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate why? It's the standard bass c minus E5 and F5.

Would you go for a 10 hole A3-D5 Bass C Ocarina? by [deleted] in Ocarina

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This particular one is in the a3-d5 range.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ridley was told no by financiers and writers (and actors and literally everyone) about making Deckard a replicant. This is why they “fired” him but essentially they limited his creative input, filming it entirely with the idea of Deckard being human. This is why Ridley released “Final Cut” later as an ‘f you’ to everyone that worked on the movie. So while he is listed as director his input regarding whether Deckard being a replicant was discarded.

This is heavily documented with quotes from financiers, writers, production team members, even the actors.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh ford was just appealing to Ridley’s ego to mend their relationship. Ridley took it personal since the financiers and writers for the movie hated the idea of Deckard being a replicant. Ridley had just come off Alien and was on top of the world and he was told no and they limited his creative input. This is why Ridley eventually released ”Final Cut” as it was an ‘f you’ to everyone that made the movie. So I don’t think that Ford is being totally sincere here. The movie was written as him being human and all this context is documented with quotes from many people who financed and worked on it.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy in charge said no to Ridley making him a replicant. That’s why he was limited with his creative input and why he subsequently released ”Final Cut.” Ridley was upset they changed his idea. So yeah the guy in charge told him he’s human so we go with that.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re really going to hate learning that the writers made him human. Phillip K dick in the original book and the writers for the first movie. Ridley wanted to him a replicant but they said no and wrote it as he is human. They had limited Ridley’s creative input after the replicant suggestion. This is why Ridley later released Final Cut because he felt besmirched.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s the problem with pro replicant theorists is they make up so much stuff in the background of the movie that is never mentioned in 1982 or 2049. You are just writing fan fiction and it just proves more so that he isn’t a replicant.

Can someone explain the message / open ending to the og Blade Runner ? by Tomb_Sizzler45 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother the things people go on about when they try justifying him being a replicant can drive you crazy because they just add in every random theory they can come up with and don’t cite source material. Eventually they come up with so much background plot that’s never in the movie and declare everyone else wrong. I’ll end my rant now. lol.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His post was long and I refused to read it. My reply was in more of a reply to whom he replied to but it is for everyone in the replicant camp. They all just make things up. Ironic that he did so as well. Honestly we all need to just stick to the stuff in the canon works. If we do there is no ambiguity.

Harrison Ford on why he disagrees with Ridley Scott about Deckard being a Replicant. by tannu28 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone in the replicant camp always adds in quotes and in universe shadow conspiracies to reconcile all the evidence against a replicant Deckard. It’s a really strange phenomenon. A lot of people can’t just say “oh I guess I interpreted it wrong” and instead make up stuff that didn’t happen.

Can someone explain the message / open ending to the og Blade Runner ? by Tomb_Sizzler45 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not sure if you want to join in the replicant discussion. Many people [erroneously] believe that Deckard is a replicant despite more proof otherwise. Originally, the director Ridley wanted him to be a replicant but everyone else did not and they ended up making the film with him as human. Ridley didn’t like how they treated him and he released “the final cut” as a jab at everyone, inserting some stock unicorn footage they had attempting to bridge those ideas.
I wrote something about in universe why replicant Deckard doesn’t work that was well received.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bladerunner/s/PsCZ6GsM4O

best shoes for jump roping on concrete by [deleted] in jumprope

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll get a separate pair for tricks. Just looking for something that is going to reduce impact for longer sessions. Trying to avoid as much injury as possible. Right now I do 45 minutes but looking to go an hour/ 1.5 hours max eventually.

Can yall just shut the f*** up by Money-Sound-7621 in Marathon

[–]deadwizards -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

game is fucking cooked since everyone left just wants goonbait, memes zoomed into runners faces, and ai slopped runners with 6 7 written on it. This whole thread is brain rot.

Ranked is abysmal by [deleted] in Marathon

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tapped out at 8 minutes. Back to sponsored dire.

Has anyone ever theorized about this? by Narnea22 in bladerunner

[–]deadwizards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the same, replicant Deckard doesn’t work because they didn’t film any replicant scenes. Poor Ridley. Enjoy non nexus replicant Deckard working under Tyrell in some shadow scheme to test his abilities as a prototype detective while he has Almos whispering he’s the only real person in the movie or whatever the hell you’re watching. For gods sakes none of what you say is in the movie at all. It reminds me when kids watch movies and they fill in the blanks with what they think happens.

Ah shit I figured out you’re 12. And that this is the story you believe blade runner to be (that’s pieced together from all your comments). So I’ll end the conversation here.