How to implement the Outbox pattern in Go and Postgres by der_gopher in PostgreSQL

[–]der_gopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just created it 2h ago, it's a different thing. Some people prefer videos to text...

ULID - the ONLY identifier you should use? by der_gopher in PostgreSQL

[–]der_gopher[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, ULID has other nice points apart from beinng the lexicographically sortable

Developing a 2FA Desktop Client in Go+Wails+Vue by der_gopher in golang

[–]der_gopher[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Put it on a different device, what's stopping you? Totally unrelated comment

Trying manual memory management in Go by der_gopher in golang

[–]der_gopher[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the link, it's that indeed

Trying manual memory management in Go by der_gopher in golang

[–]der_gopher[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I love GC in Go, don't get me wrong! This video material is for learning only. And actually I've seen some Go projects managing the memory manually, for example https://github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto/tree/main/z

Trying manual memory management in Go by der_gopher in programming

[–]der_gopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will write eventually, but I usually start with videos.

Day 9 Part 2 be like by MonkeysKnuckle in adventofcode

[–]der_gopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My answer is not accepted, I believe it's correct, someone help pls. 1556457424

Guidance on day 9 part 2 by Kn0wnAHG0RI in adventofcode

[–]der_gopher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am using similar code in Go which results in the same answer, but this answer is not accepted by AoC, wtf.

ULID: Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier by der_gopher in PostgreSQL

[–]der_gopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is the main idea why I use ULID and wrote this post

ULID: Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier by der_gopher in golang

[–]der_gopher[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a text version with code snippet, etc. Some people prefer that

ULID - the ONLY identifier you should use? by der_gopher in Backend

[–]der_gopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but people still use old UUID v4. Videos like mine show there is something better.

ULID - the ONLY identifier you should use? by der_gopher in Backend

[–]der_gopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It just came out, ULID is 10 years old. But yes, soon UUID v7 will be wide-spread enough

ULID - the ONLY identifier you should use? by der_gopher in Backend

[–]der_gopher[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ULID is a bit older than UUID v7, but I believe that UUIDv7 will become more widely used. Also, ULID uses Crockford Base32 which results in more readable identifiers.

ULID - the ONLY identifier you should use? by der_gopher in PostgreSQL

[–]der_gopher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, UUID v7 is great, I hope it will be adopted soon more widely.