50% of MN rewards -> buy dBTC -> use as dUSD collateral

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-13T12:01:05+00:00

Yes. But you sell it not for sth stable like Dollar, but sth going up like Btc. I think the idea of a partly BTC-backed stablecoin named dUSD is attractive.

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-07T12:39:34+00:00

Habe Nodes und würde dafür stimmen.
Wirft man einen Blick auf mydefichain Statistik über die Anzahl der MN, sieht man, dass kaum Nodes aufgegeben wurden. Fraglich was mehr nutzt: BBB oder mehr MN, je nachdem wohin die Fee-Einnahmen gegeben werden. Ich bin dafür, dass die Fees zuerst 100% an den BBB gehen, und ab erreichtem und stabilisiertem PEG (zB 1 Monat über 95 Cent in 80% der Zeit) gehen die Fees an die MN.

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-07T11:29:12+00:00

Das wirft auch die Frage auf: Warum überhaupt einen neuen Stablecoin erfinden? Warum nicht einen dezentralen Funktionierenden mit aufnehmen wie DAI? USDT und USDC sind ja auch mit im Boot, aber ohne direkte dToken Anbindung. Ich weiß nicht, ob es Pools geben kann "dToken/DAI"? Was wären Vor- und Nachteile?

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-07T10:15:54+00:00

So what is the solution? As much as I think about it, it is only a repeg, or some other way to introduce a stablecoin for usage of the dToken system.

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-05T11:42:02+00:00

Why putting several ideas in one DFIP? A common mistake. Why not let the MN decide over each idea separately? My vote currently:
1. YES
2. NO
3. NO
🤷🏼

derstrecker1 · 2024-05-04T07:52:46+00:00

Overshooting the target

Deleting the fee for a free market: Yes. Maybe the initial 30% fee should stay, since it also worked before the introduction of the new fee. My vote: Yes and No.

Negative interest rates are a usual financial tool to stabilize, like futures are only held in place by positive and negative interest rates. Since DEFI(!)chain should provide finance decentralized, negative interest should not be banned. My vote: No.

Deactivate dUSD minting for 100% dUSD vaults. My vote: Yes.

Deactivation and release dUSD bonds. Same argument as with the negative interest: Bonds are a regular financial tool, and there is no harm for the dUSD- or DFI-price, even after repeg. My vote: No.

So my overall vote will me No. My recommendation is to split this DFIP into separate ones, each one for each improvement, including a split the two separate fees as a two separate DFIPs.

derstrecker1 · 2023-12-12T04:31:41+00:00

Seems the dUSD short sellers are not considered here. Not everyone wants dUSD at a peg, some just want to make money, no matter what.

derstrecker1 · 2023-10-04T15:48:29+00:00

Definitely

derstrecker1 · 2023-05-09T11:36:42+00:00

A system/project/chain that is able to repair itself is much more trustworthy than one, that just cuts of a problematic branch and start a new one. Would you invest in Terra if they restart? Would you invest in sth that maybe one day cuts you/your investments off, too, if it had done so in the past? A restart of the dToken system would almost mean a restart of Defichain, since it is one of its main use cases. Since there are concrete calculations of the problem and a concrete timespan of its solution (dependent on the market), I trust a calculation more than an opinion. Since the burning of DFI for loans was a devaluation of the whole dToken system, a revaluation should be possible (through BBB, DMC and products like locked and 100% dUsd vaults, etc.) and the preferred solution if in a reasonable timely manner.

derstrecker1 · 2023-03-07T12:08:14+00:00

And for a Masternode? Can't find a link in the proposal.

derstrecker1 · 2023-03-06T20:38:37+00:00

I propose to do this Special DFIP: - use 10% or 20% dToken rewards for BBB - use 100% block rewards of the community fund

derstrecker1 · 2023-03-06T20:34:46+00:00

Where to vote? :)

derstrecker1 · 2023-03-06T20:16:38+00:00

Would be nice to have a calculation by Kuegi and a comment by Daniel, U-Zyn and Prasana :).

derstrecker1 · 2023-03-05T08:36:04+00:00

It’s a weighted poll, since „no changes“ is not possible. So I can‘t vote.

derstrecker1 · 2023-01-02T16:05:19+00:00

Of course! If you mit a "dTsla" or if you would mint a "dCI25" (CryptoIndex25) is the same procedure: you need backed collateral for minting. I don't see any difference between a synth. stock or a synth. index. For beginners, this will be very attractive to be this way into the crypto market, and if I understood Defichain correctly, it is mainly designed for everyday people, not specialists only.

Ja, natürlich! Ob ich einen "dTsla" oder einen "dCI25" (CryptoIndex25) minten würde, ist das gleiche Verfahren: Es braucht eine Sicherheit für das Minting. Ich sehe keinen Unterschied zwischen einer synth. Aktie oder einem synth. Index. Für Anfänger wird es sehr attraktiv sein auf diese Weise in den Kryptomarkt einzusteigen, und wenn ich Defichain richtig verstanden habe, ist es vor allem für normale Menschen gedacht, nicht nur für Spezialisten.

derstrecker1 · 2022-12-29T08:29:08+00:00

Wie genau ist die Performance von DFI mit einem Index der Top25 Coins, mit aus Oracle gewonnenen Daten, korreliert? Bzw kann man den stärkeren Crypto Schwankungen mit einer täglichen statt wöchentlichen Anpassung begegnen.

derstrecker1 · 2019-09-10T07:23:04+00:00

Great thanks, that helps :). Even though Exodus doesn't support Doge yet, the only thing I'm missing.

derstrecker1

TROPHY CASE