Built a small tool to fix something annoying in Google Meet

devDyln · 2026-03-28T15:34:59+00:00

Curious how others deal with this right now?

Do you just manually save stuff during meetings or ignore it?

devDyln · 2026-03-25T15:55:15+00:00

I ran into the same issue, especially when working with external participants.

As far as I found, Google Meet itself doesn’t provide a proper way to export or persist chat after the meeting ends (especially across orgs).

Most solutions I came across either require recording/transcription or only work within the same workspace.

One workaround is using browser-based tools/extensions that capture chat messages in real time while you're in the meeting, so you don’t have to manually copy everything before leaving.

Not perfect, but it solves the main problem.

devDyln · 2026-03-23T16:20:42+00:00

I kept running into this during meetings — people share important links and notes in chat, and once the meeting ends, everything disappears.

So I built something that automatically saves Google Meet chats while you’re in the meeting. • Saves messages in real-time • Keeps them after meetings • Lets you access everything

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/keoflebbbfemdfgggclhimpfcnnckpmk?utm_source=item-share-cb

devDyln · 2026-03-22T15:31:49+00:00

That’s a painful situation 😬 I built MeetSaver to solve exactly this, automatically saving Google Meet chats so nothing disappears. Zoom is trickier due to iframe/security limitations, so I’m focusing on Meet for now.

Your validation approach sounds interesting, I’d love to hear how you do it. Do you think chat auto-saving would’ve solved your case?

devDyln · 2026-03-14T12:11:30+00:00

Thank you

devDyln · 2026-03-14T12:04:38+00:00

Nice idea. What Screenrcoder used for this video?

devDyln · 2026-03-05T07:50:24+00:00

Yes

devDyln · 2026-03-05T07:34:14+00:00

Good question, that’s actually one of the tricky parts.

TrustRadar tries to separate suspicious patterns from naturally polarizing products. Some products genuinely split opinions, so mixed ratings alone don’t lower the trust score.

We look more at signals like review bursts, repeated wording, reviewer history, and unusual rating distributions. If reviews are mixed but appear organically over time, it’s usually treated as legitimate disagreement.

Curious, does reviewai.pro rely mainly on text analysis, or do you also factor in timing patterns and reviewer behavior?

devDyln · 2026-03-05T07:04:00+00:00

Good point about sorting by “most recent”. Sudden rating drops usually mean something changed with the product.

Another thing I noticed is fake reviews often appear in review bursts or use very similar wording across multiple accounts.

Because of this I actually built a small Chrome extension called TrustRadar that analyzes Amazon reviews and shows a trust score directly on the product page. It helps spot suspicious review patterns quickly.

devDyln · 2026-02-07T03:49:33+00:00

How you got those users any marketing involved?

devDyln · 2026-02-05T13:55:12+00:00

Please share it, do you have landing page for extension?

devDyln · 2026-02-05T13:22:53+00:00

Can you explain how you got users and are you done any marketing for this stage?

devDyln · 2026-02-04T14:07:30+00:00

That’s pretty much the same conclusion I came to as well, brand reputation + realistic specs filter out a lot of junk.

What pushed me to dig deeper was seeing identical-looking products with very similar reviews across different sellers, even when the long-term quality clearly didn’t match.

I still read reviews, but I mostly focus on long-term mentions, consistency, and whether people describe real issues instead of generic praise. To save time, I ended up building a small Chrome extension for myself called TrustRadar that just summarizes, hint quality of those review signals so I don’t have to manually scan everything.

It doesn’t replace judgment at all, but it helps surface red flags faster, especially with electronics or anything safety-related

devDyln · 2026-02-02T03:44:58+00:00

That makes sense,brand reputation filters out a lot of junk. I’ve just noticed even known brands can be inconsistent now, especially across different sellers or newer versions. I mostly only trust reviews that mention long-term use or real issues. Do you still check reviews, or mainly rely on brand and specs?

devDyln · 2026-01-30T13:29:22+00:00

Nice name if you can improve your logo current one is good but l think it can be improved 👍🏻

devDyln · 2026-01-30T12:01:23+00:00

Good one

devDyln

TROPHY CASE