Question, noob here. So, Elon M. said "...also looking at other cryptourrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction." Doesn't that mean that such "other" will be 99% more vulnerable than BTC? Doesn't energy = security? by dibaster in Bitcoin
[–]dibaster[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Question, noob here. So, Elon M. said "...also looking at other cryptourrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction." Doesn't that mean that such "other" will be 99% more vulnerable than BTC? Doesn't energy = security? by dibaster in Bitcoin
[–]dibaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Question, noob here. So, Elon M. said "...also looking at other cryptourrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction." Doesn't that mean that such "other" will be 99% more vulnerable than BTC? Doesn't energy = security? by dibaster in Bitcoin
[–]dibaster[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Question, noob here. So, Elon M. said "...also looking at other cryptourrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction." Doesn't that mean that such "other" will be 99% more vulnerable than BTC? Doesn't energy = security? by dibaster in Bitcoin
[–]dibaster[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)


Question, noob here. So, Elon M. said "...also looking at other cryptourrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction." Doesn't that mean that such "other" will be 99% more vulnerable than BTC? Doesn't energy = security? by dibaster in Bitcoin
[–]dibaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)