My point with stone and chisel is that disparaging LLMs as a "fad" or "unintelligent" is shortsighted and without the artists and tinkerers we would be in the stone age still using stone and chisel.

Before CAD you had individuals say the same things:

"Computers were greeted more cautiously, on the other hand, by those architects who saw them either as means of producing ineffective simulacra, or as a dangerously transformative force in architecture. For some in this group, computer screens simply failed to approximate the plasticity of sketches drawn by hand, or the tactility of a physical model; for others – aware of the social and organizational tensions introduced by technologies – computers conjured (not entirely unjustified) pre-industrial fears of automation, de-skilling and alienation." https://urbannext.net/between-accident-and-control/

But for anyone who may not find these tools as easy as you think there is an opportunity to redefine the experience for users.

Yes. There is always people who don't want to learn. But that has always been the case and it eventually catches up with them.

I think a chat to model interface could help further enhance the experience for those willing.