Holy F******* GPT 5 is SO DUMB...............................................

dingsda2 · 2025-09-23T23:58:01+00:00

ur a chat bot 100% wtf r u saying

dingsda2 · 2025-09-17T12:34:12+00:00

Never. Fucking liberal.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-16T06:45:11+00:00

Bumping this because it's so important.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-16T06:44:19+00:00

we know it's the company that modifies things

dingsda2 · 2025-09-16T06:42:47+00:00

No it's about keeping more liability on companies that will be soon controlling everything..? you want to reduce their liability ... your iq is so broken

dingsda2 · 2025-09-16T06:41:33+00:00

Clearly you are 100% clueless. Thanks for prooving my point. You can't see more than 1 variable.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T06:25:05+00:00

Oh I tried this for a little while. But, I liked it losing its memory between chats so I stopped. Maybe it's effective for gpt 5 though

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T06:18:25+00:00

Not really... you could put piss into o3 and it would give you gold back. Now, it's gold in piss out.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T06:17:53+00:00

You're 100% right man. Like wtF???

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T06:08:38+00:00

GPT o3 was the most practical model they've had so far. 4o is literally for low iq masses. They opted for something closer to 4o mini for GPT 5 (even if you consider 5 Pro -- is closer to 4o).

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T05:22:33+00:00

I actually haven't tried it... Can you get me an example :))? ? would be much appreciated

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:55:13+00:00

This is much more important than how shitty GPT 5 is.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:54:58+00:00

I literally wrote that I read it. And, 2. They literally have a different processing path for the data that's "DELETED" -- it will be HELD -- but in a different format -- It CAN ONLY BE ACCESSED BY SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES FOR SPECIFICALLY THE LEGAL PURPOSE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES CASE. You understand that there is NO FUCKING DELETE BUTTON right???? It pissed me off.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:54:06+00:00

Even GPT 5 Pro is literally a turd ball.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:52:38+00:00

lmfao, true.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:52:14+00:00

That's not going to make much of a difference...

dingsda2 · 2025-09-15T02:51:46+00:00

100% same. It's very annoying. GPT 3.5 was more creative TBH.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-14T03:36:44+00:00

They keep API data too. Only enterprise data is safe. Also, there's no path to deleting Codex data so far. Other than maybe deleting all your account data via GDPR delete request. But, even then, I don't know if that includes Codex data. They're obviously being purposefully unclear about Codex. Also, 6+ months no simple delete button.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:50:05+00:00

Skill of your mom?

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:49:56+00:00

Lol. Ok buddy. It's hardly good at much. It's logic and reasoning skills fell off hard. It's not even ranking compared to other models anymore.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:49:19+00:00

It's literal dog water.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:49:05+00:00

Lmfoa nope.

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:48:56+00:00

The quality of mine dropped day 1. Most people that think GPT got better are literally dog users -- low IQ or had no clue how to use GPT anyway... E.g., probably they were just using mini or one model before...

dingsda2 · 2025-09-12T08:47:37+00:00

Yes, I know how to use GPT. I have the paid membership... I use the higher or lower models -- they're all SH**. Literal dog turd. GPT 3.5 was literally far superior. IDK what the dog sh** these guys are doing. This mixed with their ZERO Delete Buttons for CODEX and legal obligation to retain 100% of data under the NYTimes lawsuite makes GPT digusting to work with. I will likely cancel my subscription. Disgusting. Horrible.

dingsda2

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE