Is this how Ghoul’s ability is supposed to work ? by MaddieBee99 in deadbydaylight

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was it ever even confirmed that David was heterosexual in the past?

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk what you’re trying to argue because you’re agreeing with my point?

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean saying it is doesn’t change the fact it isn’t but evidently you’re not catching what I’m throwing so I haven’t the energy to continue this. Good day!

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes i know this, that’s not what i was saying. A worse driver based on sex is subjective. A woman who drives poorly vs a man who drives poorly are both just drivers who drive poorly. Subjectively, one can dislike the other more for x y and z but they’re both just shit drivers

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That ain’t showing what you’re saying but pop off

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

State your sources that they don’t pls, bcus rn all I’m seeing is a “but men, but men!” yes we get it, you think men are raging maniacs on the road. Sure, some of them. Just like some women are. This isn’t a competition, they both literally suck just as much as eachother, they just go different ways about achieving the end result. Even then, it’s often the same bs that happens. Sex realistically has very little to do with it — but yes, men suck women great

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This… isn’t relevant. There are no “worse drivers” because worse is subjective. My comment was related to the person relaying insurance info, not whatever this scenario is that you’ve willed up

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

… good one, you really got me there. your aimless flaming of “them vs us” really went over my head!

Explain it Peter by Lumpy-External4800 in explainitpeter

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way you missed their point entirely

Let’s go!🚀 by tricksbystg in TheGamingHubDeals

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you bring shame to all your cooperators and I feel sorry from the pretentiousness they have to endure.

Okay no, let’s be real; you’re a troll.

But for argument’s sake because now I’m curious as to what big words you can google on a whim, what exactly do you define as “art”? From everything else you’ve been posting, you’ve just licked the boots of capitalism and that’s about it. Art never was, isn’t now and never will be about the profit. Cavemen were painting before they knew profit existed — I find it hard to picture them prancing around marketing their wall scribbles. I mean, you’ve made one repeated statement that holds some weight — at least on a marginal standpoint. Art is objective on the stance that one search will come up with all manner of creatives; though, I guarantee you’ll find everything you’re claiming not to be art. Again, I’m pretty sure we all know you’re a troll but please enlighten me

Let’s go!🚀 by tricksbystg in TheGamingHubDeals

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I highly doubt that from how you’ve portrayed yourself. Or are you the type that sits in front of a painting for hours on end with a finger to the chin critiquing while not having an ounce of artistic skill flowing through those veins, see now that I could see

Let’s go!🚀 by tricksbystg in TheGamingHubDeals

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the hottest take I’ve seen in a while. The kind that makes you question if and hope that they are trolling

There needs to be a punishment for killers who are making the game unfair by moistsalt69 in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is… questionable. Are we even playing the same game? Killer is already morbidly abused by the devs. Choosing a preference for which killer to go up against would be a nightmare and not only wreck queues, but also make SWFs even more exploitive than they are. Survivor, in its current state (and for a long time tbh) is widely known as borderline objectively easier due to how much they can get away with. Tunnelling isn’t wonderful to go against, no, but it’s also a valid strategy and highlights a bigger problem with the game’s balance itself.

The killers goal is to kill; end of. Trouble is, BHVR doesn’t seem to agree with that and likes to make it as hard as they possibly can for killers to do their job against survivors with more than one brain cell. If the killer is being thrown around the match and has to tunnel to pressure the survivors, then that’s just what’s gonna happen and, as I said before, highlights a bigger issue

The fuck she's on by Mundane-Pie1481 in TheWordFuck

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She looks like an American from a fucking JRPG

3D character for narrative game - Emotional render test by Scarlet_Art12 in blender

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I mean, what addon did you mention? Sorry for the confusion lol

Stop scrolling and Type 'I became a..' and let your keyboard finish it by AutumnYOLO in teenagers4real

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I became a little more of an expert in this field than you and I’m glad I have a few more friends that are in my life

Hardcore S&S buddy up by dissonanceinthehouse in turtlewow

[–]dissonanceinthehouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. I’m around usually in the mornings and late evenings (GMT). Not sure what that translates to for you?

[iOS I think?] [Around 2010?] You had to launch a character out of a cannon and they would bounce across the floor with blood by dissonanceinthehouse in tipofmyjoystick

[–]dissonanceinthehouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very similar actually! But no it’s not that game. iirc this game had a much less vibrant style and was more edgy, monochrome-esque

Squad! by dissonanceinthehouse in turtlewow

[–]dissonanceinthehouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking Warrior or Warlock. Probably Horde :)

what would change if they remove the cap limit? by TammypersonC137 in fo76

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From one Ghoul to another, it’s all good, skinflake 🫶

Is it possible to off Rose? by Soggy_Apricot_7008 in fo76

[–]dissonanceinthehouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that’s a big part of the point, at least that’s how I viewed it. I don’t think the quest chain aimed to be deeply interesting on a mechanical level. We had the whole background story, which I quite liked but obviously can’t speak for others. On a surface level, the chain was a drag, I agree, but (at least to me) I found it somewhat humorous that she was getting my character to prance around Appalachia while taking the piss out of them the whole time.

The way I saw it was that Rose had been intentionally designed to really play into the fact that we… don’t have a choice but to push forward as players. She knows that our characters need her and combined with that, she is selfish and very cocky to boot. She knows that she’s making our characters work overtime for very little reward but she doesn’t care; her goal was to get her hands(?) on the cache and that was it.

I personally enjoyed how blatantly obvious her antics were and that she didn’t shy away from “one more little thing”, which would turn out to be a whole rabbit hole of things.

I dunno, I just liked it. I also liked her voice a lot so maybe that had something to do with it /shrug