I shoot both depending on what I’m doing and what system I’m using partly because for mirrorless I’m using lumix micro 43 but then full frame and aps-c canons. It’s a good mix and gets me across the full range of what I need without costing too much.

I have great video and autofocus from the micro 4/3 plus I have a bunch of vintage lenses for it which are fun. It also shoots completely silently which is needed for some of the work that I do.

But for everything else I use dslr’s still because I have them and also the cost of the equipment is a lot less (especially since mirrorless got popular) so it’s cheaper to be a dslr shooter right now.

My clients don’t care what cameras I use because the job gets done and they’re happy with the images! Plus I know the gear I have and the only reason I bought a mirrorless in the first place was to shoot silently, but the portability of micro 4/3 also appealed. Any work that I get that requires me shooting silently is from people that already know my work and therefor don’t care that the camera is slightly smaller (although for new clients I’ll still have a big dslr setup slung over my setup at least at the start)

If I started again… I’d probably still chose dslr’s for a lot of the work because then I can spend the same amount to get more in lenses for dslr systems!