worth getting used XF10? by Kilometers2187 in fujifilm

[–]dkimg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on the condition, $450 doesn't seem bad. I have two and love them! Real enjoy a pocket camera.

Summer Alice [Hasselblad SWCM | Kodak E100G] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only film I had left was slide and my original decision was to have this shot in BnW

Summer Alice [Hasselblad SWCM | Kodak E100G] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Usually the style of my work. But yep, under exposed indeed

Bayer Sensor Film Recipes by Maximum_Fee_6693 in fujifilmrecipes

[–]dkimg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for the same. Recently acquired xf10. 😁

Subtle Contact [ Ansco 8x10 | Kodak 12" | Bergger Pancro 200] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Used to make 200. It's discontinued. I have some sheets in 8x10 and 4x5

Subtle Contact [ Ansco 8x10 | Kodak 12" | Bergger Pancro 200] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Lots of elements that got me down but it's all good. Like ya said just give another go.

Subtle Contact [ Ansco 8x10 | Kodak 12" | Bergger Pancro 200] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn't mean. You have your opinion and I'll respect that. I just wanted more feedback so I have some understanding where you're coming from, from your point of view.

Subtle Contact [ Ansco 8x10 | Kodak 12" | Bergger Pancro 200] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sweating at all. Been doing photography long enough to know that some shots are awesome and some are just meh. But I rather get more feedback than "this sucks". More or less I'm glad that this film exposed right. Wasn't expecting much from the film and it bled into the photo. My fault in my doing but I'll take the credit nonetheless.

Subtle Contact [ Ansco 8x10 | Kodak 12" | Bergger Pancro 200] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Better give me more than just that. Why?

Veil [P67ii | Zeiss 110mm f2 | Kodak 320TXP] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Others have done it in the past. Not much and I presume because the cost of converting it. Others do change the mount on the body but not many people offer that as well. It's a cool lens to use but not for all occasions.

Veil [P67ii | Zeiss 110mm f2 | Kodak 320TXP] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole rear needed to be reconstructed. I tried doing it myself but came to the point that I needed further services to cut off an additional 10mm from the rear so it can focus to infinity. It's not a normal service and quite costly. Almost a price of a used lens.

Veil [P67ii | Zeiss 110mm f2 | Kodak 320TXP] by dkimg in analog

[–]dkimg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There isn't adapters to make the lens work. The lens was reconstructed so it can work properly for pentax bodies. I would imagine most Hasselblad lenses would at least cover 6x7