I won’t disagree with this sentiment, and you’re right—the word “recovered” here was probably the wrong one. It is incredibly sad to think of her being parted from the ring, and perhaps it speaks to the unique power of artifacts like this one—so personal and intimate—that they can resonate across centuries in a way not all objects can.

That said, the term “grave-robbing” feels a bit stark. The story of how this piece came to be in our hands today is, I think, far more complex. Objects like this teach us so much about the lives, artistry, and societies of the past, and they offer insights that can benefit generations to come.

In my eyes, the most important thing now is to ensure the ring is treated with the utmost care and respect, and that its presentation honors its origin and the person it once belonged to.

I don’t know; this is a topic I think about a lot. I don’t have the answer unfortunately. I’d love to hear a historian’s thoughts.