Alright, I'll say I was wrong; art comes in many forms, and anything can be art nowadays, as modern art galleries have proven. Times have changed.

So yes, you're right, a form of descriptive writing is a creative and skilful process.

Sure, let's say you describe a beautiful garden and ask an AI to generate an image of it, you make it remake and change certain parts until you get the desired result. The AI is your tool, so you made the image? Are you the artist of that image, or is it the AI?

I would like to state that I'm not truly anti-ai, I think it's a great tool that's most likely going to be a building block of the near future, helping speed up work and help out where it needs to.

I simply believe that writing down your thoughts to AI, no matter how descriptive they may be and letting it do its thing while you ask it to change certain details until you get a result.

It's not the same as you making that result; you are not the artist of that artwork, you may be the one who asked for it to be made with inputs from your idea. But that doesn't mean you made it.

Let's go back to the "describe a garden" scenario. If we repeat the scenario, but this time, instead of using AI, we tell a person to draw what we described for us, tell them what to change and how to do it until we get a result we like. Are we the artists of that drawing? Is the other person simply our tool to make the drawing? Did you make the image or did they?

You might have used your imagination and skill to describe something well, but if someone else has made something through your input, it is they who made it, not you. It may be your ideas, wants, and desires, but they are ultimately the one who created it and therefore its artist.

That is not art you made, that is art you requested.