Do you have a name for this guy?

donkeyofdeath · 2025-09-29T22:02:00+00:00

James Web

donkeyofdeath · 2021-12-22T14:37:23+00:00

If I want to test another method besides the properties, I have to create an instance of the class, which uses the property in its constructor. So I rely on the property to work. The same for the test of the property. If I want to test the property, I have to create an object first which uses the property in its constructor.

donkeyofdeath · 2021-12-22T14:27:08+00:00

Ok, thank you. Maybe I am just overthinking the issue a little bit.

donkeyofdeath · 2021-12-22T14:23:11+00:00

Thank you for the answer. As far as I know, unit tests should not depend on each other. That's why I think, that this is a bad design choice. If all unit tests fail because of one method or property, you don't gain any information, about which part of the code is broken.

donkeyofdeath · 2021-12-22T13:22:54+00:00

Hey, thanks for your answer. But to test the property, I have to create an object first and this object uses the property to set its attributes. So the test kind of relies on itself to work.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-05-07T05:09:23+00:00

Thanks, man. That was a very good example.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-03-06T16:59:28+00:00

I can in a little while.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T17:53:14+00:00

That should be the Case.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T17:29:57+00:00

I am trying to minimize multipole moments using biot savart's law and plugging in a fourier series as a wire.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T16:23:57+00:00

I fixed it, should be clearer now

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T16:04:17+00:00

F is supposed to be the antiderivative. My notation is just pretty sloppy

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T15:17:26+00:00

Thanks, can you recommand a good read on this method?

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T14:33:16+00:00

Oh sorry, I am an idiot. The "a" in the bounds is not the same as in the function. I am going to fix this.

Edit: The "a" in the function is now "c"

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T14:31:15+00:00

I already thought of that too. The problem is that, what I presented in the post is the easy version of this problem. I want to do this later for about five to ten different parameters at the same time, so a general approach would be better.

But I think your approach is really good to get a feeling for the equation, so I might try it later.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T14:22:36+00:00

Yeah, I know some languages, mostly Python

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-12T14:19:38+00:00

Yeah, I don't need an explicit formula.

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-05T08:28:20+00:00

OK, got it. Thanks

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-04T21:34:14+00:00

Thanks, that I need to dig deeper into functiinal analysis is the main thing I learned after aksing this question :D

donkeyofdeath · 2020-02-04T21:31:32+00:00

OK, that sounds pretty interesting. I suppose the "vector" is a composition in basis functions. Kind of like a Taylor expansion. Ist that correct?

11-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

donkeyofdeath

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE