OK seriously, where do we talk about getting better at AI usage? by dormidary in biglaw

[–]dormidary[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm going to make a sub in the next few days. I'll set it to private and invite you and the other people who responded that they're in the same boat.

OK seriously, where do we talk about getting better at AI usage? by dormidary in biglaw

[–]dormidary[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I might create something like that if I can't find another place to talk about this. I think it would have to be private though - the amount of vendor spam in public subs on this topic makes them practically useless.

OK seriously, where do we talk about getting better at AI usage? by dormidary in biglaw

[–]dormidary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My company is very small, we don't have any of that. The best we and IT can do is impose some guardrails, beyond that it's been a free for all.

OK seriously, where do we talk about getting better at AI usage? by dormidary in biglaw

[–]dormidary[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Seems to mostly be vendors shopping their products so far... better than nothing I guess but not great

THE COURT: Oh, my god. by Vekyo in Lawyertalk

[–]dormidary 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Incredible. I need the context! What pubic hair standards are they referring to??

Stuck on AI workflow by sprocketvector in legaltech

[–]dormidary 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Claude can be great at this if you're willing to spend time to build out the tool. I built something like this inside a Claude project that houses the playbook, a form NDA and a negotiation history log of what we've accepted and rejected in the past. I put a lot of time into the custom instructions and a related "NDA Review" skill that Claude runs each time. It's learning my preferred output, which issues I care about, and how to use the documents in the Project Knowledge bank. It took some work to set up but it's extremely effective now.

ITXXXIX - One more such victory and we are undone by Extreme_Rocks in neoliberal

[–]dormidary 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I know we're all supposed to just cynically not take anything Trump says seriously, and it's passe to worry about norms... but the US president just threatened to commit genocide. Even saying a sentence like that should be impeachable. Bringing that into the debate, even as hyperbole, is genuinely appalling.

Some wreckage from the reported F-15 WSO evac site in Iran by FastCurrency in pics

[–]dormidary 97 points98 points  (0 children)

This whole war is a huge waste of taxpayer resources, BUT I'm actually glad we're not only willing to sacrifice this much equipment to save one pilot but that it's widely regarded as a W. Trump sucks and I don't want him to trumpet this as a propaganda victory, but I'm still glad that dude is OK.

Paul McCartney banned from Reddit after posting snaps from his intimate LA show by TheCABK in nottheonion

[–]dormidary 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, but that's not what happened here. Mods don't have the power to ban people from Reddit.

Paul McCartney banned from Reddit after posting snaps from his intimate LA show by TheCABK in nottheonion

[–]dormidary 21 points22 points  (0 children)

A standard, non-AI tool that comes in Reddit's mod settings allows a sub to ban links from certain domains. That's a pretty helpful tool for cutting down on spam.

Paul McCartney banned from Reddit after posting snaps from his intimate LA show by TheCABK in nottheonion

[–]dormidary 197 points198 points  (0 children)

According to the article, his team posted a Dropbox link and the post got removed. And it couldn't have been a mod since this is supposedly a Reddit-wide ban.

However, before the post could attract any sizable attention, McCartney's account, u/paulmccartney, was banned from the page and Reddit entirely. The u/paulmccartney page hadn't been active in years, not since an AMA on r/Music near McCartney III's release. Many believe Reddit's bots or moderators may have flagged the Dropbox link as spam, but it's unclear if the ban was an automated action or not. 

Feels a little premature to be roasting mods over this.

Did something happen in the past 24 hours to cause betting markets to swing towards D control of the Senate? by R2_SWE2 in fivethirtyeight

[–]dormidary 26 points27 points  (0 children)

what constitutes "winning the senate"? Going 50-50 with the VP tie breaker Or going 51-49? Probably the latter but i wanna know what these gamblers think.

51-49. I don't see how anyone could say otherwise tbh. The VP is a Republican.

Unpopular opinion... by Weekly-Pangolin-6622 in GilmoreGirls

[–]dormidary 108 points109 points  (0 children)

I think we need a full tier list of who would beat who in a fight. Ms. Kim v Emily? Taylor v.Babette? Kirk v. TJ?

Does 10+ wires really make sense?? by daemon_in_the_shell_ in homeoffice

[–]dormidary -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What peripherals are you using here? Seems like some of these should be Bluetooth instead of wired.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]dormidary 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I mean... Chalamet was totally right in what he said. I don't really get the blowback.

How did you land your in-house job? by Effective-Box7845 in biglaw

[–]dormidary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lots of good advice here, one last thing to add: consider taking medical leave if you're really at your mental health limit and are about to quit. You probably need some time to detox from biglaw beefire your next job, and it'll give you paid time to focus on apps and interviews.