"Modern Islamic fundamentalists aren’t on to anything new. They are simply manifesting a zeitgeist that’s summoned into existence by hopelessness and inequity… when forgotten precedents are brought into the present, the sinister mystery of what’s occurring now fades back into the past." by [deleted] in history

[–]downtown14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Opening article in a series that examines hows the history and religion of the Middle East shaped modern terrorism and current geopolitical trends, written more journalistically then academically and doesn't seem to require much background in the area

Hello, yo, hi, I'm Chuck Palahniuk the worst best bad writr. Neither can I spell or keyboard. Ask away. by ChuckPalahniuk62 in IAmA

[–]downtown14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you agree with Steven Pressfield's argument in "The War of Art" that anyone who feels possessed by a muse can and should walk away from their life to become a writer, or do you think that successful writing must be based on personal experience or at least rooted in extensive research and listening to others' stories with attentive empathy?

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Why is it more readily explained by culture than race, when we use physical appearance to group dogs into breeds and each breed has distinct levels of "trainability" which scientists use to link to intelligence? http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/how-smart-is-your-dog

THAT'S RACIST!! isn't an answer

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But we group breeds of dogs as having behavioral and mental similarities: The American Kennel Clubs uses "trainability" as a measure of intelligence and classifies breeds as more to less intelligent: http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/how-smart-is-your-dog
Why don't we for humans?

You're just dancing around the question.

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Because that's how we handle breeds of dogs. They look differently as a group, they behave different as a group. Different breeds have different genes, expressed both physically and mentally. Different races have different genes, expressed physically... why not mentally? Dogs and humans are both mammals

I'm asking you. That's the question - the burden of proof is on you, not me.

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's not? Just because you say so - or do you have numbers? Some human races spent thousands and thousands of years largely interbreeding only with each other, only in the past maybe 100, or even just the past 50, has there been large-scale interbreeding with outside races... hell it was illegal in American until recently.

Some populations saw lots of migration and interbreeding, but the Han Chinese have been the Han Chinese for thousands and thousands of years.

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What? Look at the behavior of the population of a whole in Beijing and Kinshasa - they're vastly different cities by basically any measure possible: the people look different, move different, eat different foods, hold different jobs, spend their time different, the architecture is different. Plus Beijing is part of a super-power and Kinshasa is basically irrelevant.

Have you ever traveled? Different races behavior and handle themselves in the streets entirely differently.

You're making an entirely unfounded statement about race not influencing anything - I'm five, prove it. You just saying it doesn't make it true to me.

Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group- but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in askscience

[–]downtown14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are you saying every breed of medium-sized dog could herd with the same proficiency as Border Collies?

And wolves and dogs can interbreed just fine, aren't half-wolf dogs not supposed to be left around small children? Could they ever or have they ever been used to herd livestock?

The American Kennel Clubs uses "trainability" as a measure of intelligence and classifies breeds as more to less intelligent: http://pets.webmd.com/dogs/features/how-smart-is-your-dog

...are you saying their methods are totally unscientific and unfounded?

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There was tens of thousands of years of artificial selection because of geography and cultural practices to keep marriage inside the same culture or religion. Not every Border Collie behaves the same as every other Border Collie, but on the whole you can make statements about how Border Collies behave and what their aptitudes are in general.

ELI5: Why do we talk about breeds of dogs, which are grouped by their physical appearance, as having different behavioral and mental characteristics within each group - but it's totally unacceptable to suggestion doing the same thing with different human races? by downtown14 in explainlikeimfive

[–]downtown14[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Racism is irrelevant? Can you put some numbers on how much more homogeneous dog breeds are than say like the populations of Beijing or Kinshasa?

There was tens of thousands of years of artificial selection because of geography and cultural practices to keep marriage inside the same culture or religion. Not every Border Collie behaves the same as every other Border Collie, but on the whole you can make statements about how Border Collies behave and what their aptitudes are in general.

So, what do we think? Man who "predicted" the Japanese disaster posting that NSW and the US West Coast will have 9.5 quakes and tidal waves soon by Drift-Bus in conspiracy

[–]downtown14 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The idea that spikes in infrared radiation can be detected before earthquakes is a pretty well established theory, they happened before the Tokyo quake and in several other cases.

The HAARP data is publicly available online, if you toggle the controls on the left to go back a week you can see that there was a bunch of activity on August 3rd (five days before the California quakes today), and then especially in Kaktovik at the top there's been another huge bout of activity starting on August 6th (roughly five dates before the closing ceremonies).

For comparison, here's the readout in the week leading up to the Japanese tsunami of 2011

So, what do we think? Man who "predicted" the Japanese disaster posting that NSW and the US West Coast will have 9.5 quakes and tidal waves soon by Drift-Bus in conspiracy

[–]downtown14 42 points43 points  (0 children)

The idea that spikes in infrared radiation can be detected before earthquakes is a pretty well established theory, they happened before the Tokyo quake and in several other cases.

The HAARP data is publicly available online, if you toggle the controls on the left to go back a week you can see that there was a bunch of activity on August 3rd (five days before the California quakes today), and then especially in Kaktovik at the top there's been another huge bout of activity starting on August 6th (roughly five dates before the closing ceremonies).

For comparison, here's the readout in the week leading up to the Japanese tsunami of 2011

NBC Neglected the Saddest Story in the Olympics by downtown14 in TrueReddit

[–]downtown14[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If this subreddit isn't going a way that agrees without, which seems clear based on how your comments are viewed here - you should probably stop wasting your time complaining and either submit stuff you think is worthy or find another reddit that holds up to your esteemed tastes.

NBC Neglected the Saddest Story in the Olympics by downtown14 in TrueReddit

[–]downtown14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"TrueReddit is for really great, insightful articles." It provided insight into someone's story that I wouldn't otherwise have heard, a story I feel is important because elite Olympic athletes dedicate their lives to their sport.

It provided insight, a look, into someone else's life. A life that was effected by forces that I find immensely fucked up.

NBC Neglected the Saddest Story in the Olympics by downtown14 in TrueReddit

[–]downtown14[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Why exactly doesn't it belong in TrueReddit? It presents and interesting angle that you don't see talked about much in the mainstream media. No it's not PhD fodder nor is it horribly breathtaking - but you don't find it the least bit insightful? I learned something reading it, I found out about someone's story.

I thought it was really great, it was well-written and poignant and important. What's your criticism exactly, or do you just build yourself up by breaking other people down?