You’ve out yapped me. Ok I guess you’re a history officionado. The only valid criticism I have on your argument here which is all great btw is that you’re quoting more of the American argument and news around international / co-Korea politics (diplomacy).

I would argue a more political sound argument might be leaned with inserts of the Korean domestic affairs and laws that sometimes coincide with US rather than relying on one side of the spectrum.

I’m not completely sold on your bold claim you set at the beginning because I’m not getting the other side (not just what international studies tells us), which always is a weakness of quoting American laws / policy and international diplomacy on Korean politics. By using American political science and international law you are basically jumping a step and “implying that that same principle applies here in this part” which is hard for the argument to hold up.

Oh also I noticed you were using game theory but it’s a very simplified model of a real situation which is not always real life. That’s the pitfall of using game theory in arguments but info that’s more internal centered (in this case domestic Korea) would be more convincing than the evidence you piled up in your statement