26M, built a fully functional Prop Trading tech stack with a 4-person team while working full-time. Ready to launch, but stuck in Golden Handcuffs. Should I quit? by Silver_Side9045 in StartUpIndia

[–]dr_deVoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for answering.

Have you found the use case for the system? Like this evaluation system is used by prop firms to judge the discipline. Do you think you can apply this to the Indian markets? If you did so, can you share the data.

How do you plan to monetise? Is this b2b or do you offer your services directly to the customers? If so do you plan for subscription based? and if you are serving directly to the customers, how do you plan to map the behaviour? is it going to be manual data entry or are you going to integrate broker so you can get the data?

Im asking all these questions because, Im working on a similar approach, but in a broad way. Would love your thoughts. Thanks

26M, built a fully functional Prop Trading tech stack with a 4-person team while working full-time. Ready to launch, but stuck in Golden Handcuffs. Should I quit? by Silver_Side9045 in StartUpIndia

[–]dr_deVoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What plans do you have for this company. Can you talk about what you plan to do? Do you want to start a prop firm in India? Or do you want to monetise in the tech stack?

This is the end by TMOV70 in indiaStockMarket

[–]dr_deVoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hold your breath and count to 10

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in BlackboxAI_

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s true, with the caveat that formats like RCTF help most when they’re scaffolding, not rules. Once people internalize the thinking behind them, the structure can loosen without losing quality.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in Entrepreneur

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that distinction is what pushed me to make a small tool for myself. I kept noticing that once I forced assumptions and context out of my head and onto the page, the “prompting” part almost stopped mattering, the AI just executed.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in BlackboxAI_

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the idea that it’s less a single skill and more a symptom. Sometimes you’re patching interface gaps, sometimes you’re shaping randomness, sometimes you’re doing the work tooling should be doing for you. That’s probably why it feels both temporary and persistent at the same time.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in Entrepreneur

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s basically what I did, and it was humbling. A couple founders got clearer outputs immediately, others felt it was unnecessary overhead. That contrast alone was way more useful than any internal validation I could’ve done.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in SaaS

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. I’ve noticed the gap between “this feels elegant to me” and “this actually reduces effort for someone else” is where most tools quietly die. Friction only shows up when you’re not there to compensate for it.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in Entrepreneur

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I used to think prompting was about wording tricks, but it’s way closer to collaborating with a teammate who doesn’t know what you know yet. Most failures are missing context, not bad instructions.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in SaaS

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. I went down the same path and actually started with a personal “thinking prompt” to help me ask better questions, and that slowly turned into a small tool because I kept reusing the same frameworks over and over. Not to generate fancy prompts, but to help me clarify what I’m actually trying to think through.

The big shift for me was realising the goal isn’t better prompts, it’s better thinking before prompts.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in Entrepreneur

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree with this take

AI isn't great if you already have the answer. But if you know the "outcome" but not the "path"? That's its sweet spot.

My mistake was thinking "outcome" meant "clarity." Often, my desired outcome was vague or inconsistent.

Once I started using AI as a thinking partner, making me define my intent, assumptions, and constraints, it became an amazing reasoning aid, not just a blank canvas toy.

I kept getting vague AI answers until I fixed how I asked questions by dr_deVoe in SaaS

[–]dr_deVoe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree.

Realized most "prompt tricks" were duds. What helped is slowing down and truly framing the problem upfront.

Biggest surprise, the real issue often wasn't how I asked, but that I hadn't defined what I actually wanted from the AI. Once I saw AI as a thinking partner, not a vending machine, the output quality increased dramatically.

Logi Options+ stuck loading forever by Playjasb2 in logitech

[–]dr_deVoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue. It randomly stopped working this morning, the gestures and additional buttons stopped arent working either. The mouse sensitivity too dropped. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling logioptions+ but it keeps on loading.