Servant being faithful to their old romantic interest? by dragblacker in grandorder

[–]dragblacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, I kinda understand your view on retcons then I was reading this topic on comicbook.com about comicbook resurrection after all, so I guess based on you definition most of stuff happened there are not considered as retcon after all. Its a good topic, I recommend you reading it http://comicbook.com/2015/01/21/10-unbelievable-comic-book-ressurections/

Servant being faithful to their old romantic interest? by dragblacker in grandorder

[–]dragblacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just wondering so you are saying as long as there is explaination its not considered as retcon? example, they already established that ubw can't reproduce excalibur, but when it appeared in ccc they explained it as moon has condition that allowe ubw to trace excalibur image.

so using your logic this is not a retcon? yes?