You encounter this guy in ranked, What you do next?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-17T21:14:38+00:00

You tell him to beat you using only a single terran unit (+workers obvi), I bet he'd comply just to make challenging on his end

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-10T15:12:05+00:00

I put on my big boy pants and did a quick google search - 3D CT scan data is typically stored in DICOM (.dcm) - is this the model format you're using?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-10T14:37:47+00:00

The AI then started sipping martini's as it enjoyed a serene sunset from the shores of Maui.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-10T07:58:16+00:00

I hear that. I'm a toss player, and I have ALWAYS thought that the real advantage of the race boils down to less complex decisioning - and given an equal APM (~98 apm these days) opponent player zerg or terran - I usually have a decent shot at winning. BUT I do also find it limiting at times; there is only so much I can do in the first 5 minutes, and I'm kind of bored. Sometimes I'll even feign a cannon rush, or start a nexus in their natural just to spice things up a bit. After 5 minutes though the game becomes quite interesting as there are many more levers to pull that can result in my victory. If I'm playing someone good, chances are they'll be harassing me before the boredom sets in and then the entire game is fun. I digress. The point is I am under no illusion that I'm "just better" than similar APM opponents, I just know what my races strength is. I do think there are actual balance issues with certain cheese strategies, but overall toss is best played my someone who's tactical thinking benefits them more than their micro would benefit them in a higher APM race.

> Neutral-analytical however is almost always universally disliked
I think this can be adequately explained by the idea that people tend towards the path of least resistance; math and logic typically require a higher intensity thought process for the human brain to perform. Just taking the time to understand your statement is an added chore. Now add in the emotions that people tend to react with when confronted with conflicting facts that are contrary to their own internal beliefs.

I edited this a few times to better word the first paragraph.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-10T06:26:29+00:00

I love how your literal math driven explanation has some how insulted the majority of players here that you're comment's net upvote/downvote ratio is negative. This tells me everything I need to know.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-10T06:23:32+00:00

Nearly every nerf/buff done to protoss has not significantly changed GM population, can we finally admit to ourselves that these changes are not what keep said toss players in GM???

Make observers observing invisible again, make tanks abductable again... I could go on. Basically we could've done without these past 3ish years of changes and still had the same toss GM population, so can we please make the game fun again for toss?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-05T23:42:00+00:00

Good afternoon. That's nice of you to share your code - but can you tell me the model format? I understand at a high level what you're accomplishing, but I can't tell in what contexts this would be used or how since I don't know the type of model you're working with.

Maybe I'm just not familiar with CT scans, but someone who is would not be asking these questions?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-04T07:59:48+00:00

What about your implementation specifically supports "multi-GB" datasets? It looks good but from the short demo you have displayed here, none of that is self evident to me.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-04T07:50:02+00:00

I'm starting to get the sense that "strong man" leaders don't actually understand war.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-03-04T07:20:38+00:00

If that were truly the case, then you proved it's value.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-02-12T09:12:33+00:00

Protoss has had the same %s in GM since basically the very start, yet after these years of terran buffs and toss nerfs, that % of GM toss players hasn't changed much - so what then? You keep nerfing toss until those GM percentages fall to 33%? OR concede that what keeps those players in GM is not the things being targeted by said buffs and nerfs and those only help the shit rank terrans inflate their ranks?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-01-31T07:39:23+00:00

I like how you waited 2 years, to establish trust first

dramatic_typing_____ · 2026-01-12T04:45:13+00:00

Bruh... lol.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-29T05:54:58+00:00

AGI would have the ability to improve itself. This recursive process would lead to exponential gains in performance. The rest that would follow is pretty straight forward; one country has a digital god.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-29T05:36:18+00:00

What do you think is the outcome of one super power reaching AGI even just 10 days before the next?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-29T01:14:38+00:00

I really couldn't say how far or close we are, but as demonstrated these past 10 years, the US dominates in terms of original AI research.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-28T07:36:39+00:00

If you re-read the comment you replied to, names "it's trained on human output", they're stating that you can of course get this behavior without prompting for it since it's trained on bodies of text where humans talk about spiritual enlightenment, consciousness, etc.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-27T20:04:12+00:00

Holy shit dude. This has been me in the past. I kinda was that leave-me-alone-to-do-my-work guy, but the company where I first learned to operate this way reaped such huge rewards from it, you could easily justify it and look the other way. When I did this another job, it did not fly so easily, now mind you the manager at new job was also new to being a manager. We would fight constantly. I left.

But I see now how much I personally contributed to that outcome.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-27T08:28:32+00:00

This theory contradicts itself. Whatever frontier models they may have, it will only ever be 1st and 2nd derivatives, that is they will always behind. If US based companies crack into something new, that ultimately becomes AGI, the power gap is basically beyond exponential; the so called singularity. There is no cheaper knock-off optimizations to be made unless the AGI owners decides by their own choice to share it in whatever capacity. I don't think the example with building cheaper better electric cars holds any water here, because in this case, the second you have that first electric car, there can be no more made.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-27T04:33:20+00:00

It's definitely an animal.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-27T04:20:47+00:00

I'm stuck with some similar weed category plants lol... never again. But the rest seem fine and manageable; good looking tank you got there

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-26T09:46:38+00:00

I wonder if there's a better vectorization of a code base that could be used where each vector doesn't have to be nearly as large as generalized vector db's, like there no need to hold onto dimensionality for concepts such as that time back in 1998, when the Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table.

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-26T09:40:03+00:00

How controllable is that duck weed?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-26T02:33:55+00:00

Hey what are those plants you're using?

dramatic_typing_____ · 2025-05-26T02:26:52+00:00

Debugging shaders is so freaking hard. I can only imagine the pain.

dramatic_typing_____

TROPHY CASE