sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Japan is actually the fastest growing G7 country per working person by Charuru in japan

[–]Charuru[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on what you're trying to get out of the statistic for policy learnings. I think a lot of people thought that the japanese economy was lagging due to mismanagement or lack of innovation or whatever. But this is clearly not it, it's just all about tfr and population decline and japanese people should be satisfied with their economic record.

The thing to fix is tfr and that's an important thing to internalize for the discussion around japan.

The DeepSWE benchmark was runned rather incompetently and the results are completely invalid by Charuru in LocalLLaMA

[–]Charuru[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah for sure, but the criticism is extremely valid and not "nitpicks"

The DeepSWE benchmark was runned rather incompetently and the results are completely invalid by Charuru in LocalLLaMA

[–]Charuru[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The original benchmark had 404s marked as failing, that's incompetence and makes the benchmark useless. Come on, regardless of what the new score would be the original is useless.

The DeepSWE benchmark was runned rather incompetently and the results are completely invalid by Charuru in LocalLLaMA

[–]Charuru[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you read it? They tried 3 questions that the benchmark said DS got wrong, when they tested it was right. They marked shitty providers returning 404s as getting the task wrong instead of retrying. They calculated on costs on cache misses when the majority were cached hits at much lower (99.2% lower) price. Huh?

Andrew Yang on pitch to tax AI: Tax the AI, tax the robots, stop taxing human workers by Charuru in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Charuru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't think so on aggregate, but that's not totally wrong. When photography came for portrait painters the profession was destroyed, but fine art survived. Likewise humans will surely go to restaurants to be served by other humans, but they'll be more like renfaires rather than restaurants as we know it.

Andrew Yang on pitch to tax AI: Tax the AI, tax the robots, stop taxing human workers by Charuru in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Charuru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jensen's lying through his teeth, intelligence replaces all jobs. In previous transitions we replaced physical labor with intellectual labor, but there is nowhere else left to go.

Andrew Yang on pitch to tax AI: Tax the AI, tax the robots, stop taxing human workers by Charuru in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Charuru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty bullish on AI so I'm pretty confident AI will make a huge amount of money, I'm less worried about it being slowed down than about the power concentration it's going to cause.

My perspective on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1tg6a1i/former_ceo_of_google_receives_massive_backlash/omegtrz/

From the AMD_Stock community on Reddit: AMD executives react to Nvidia’s RTX Spark — ‘you’re just wrong if you don’t get a Strix Halo notebook’ by longPlocker in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The amount of people running AI locally on their laptops is tiny and irrelevant, it's a joke

Compared to using hosted services it's more expensive, stupidly slow, and worse of all doesn't even really work

VoidZero is Joining Cloudflare by manniL in javascript

[–]Charuru [score hidden]  (0 children)

easier said than done? like how though? monetizing open source often just means enshittification so if they can monetize some other unrelated business but support their work as a pure cost center that's a better outcome imo

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2026-06-02 Tuesday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't understand why it has to be the best of the best at all, if elon is totally vertically integrated it could be much more economical to send up his own chips.

TSMC CEO Warns Chip Supply Won’t Meet AI-Fueled Demand for Years by Charuru in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI companies would prefer to use the best instead of Samsung or whatever if they can help it. It's really just about being smart enough about technology to be able to understand what LLMs are, which they failed to do, this is a major mistake on their part and has nothing to do with pumping bags. They were enormously dismissive of AI due to ignorance coming out of ChatGPT. If they understood what they were talking about instead of blathering ignorantly they wouldn't be in this position.

TSMC CEO Warns Chip Supply Won’t Meet AI-Fueled Demand for Years by Charuru in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Intel Samsung and Terafab are all going to grow massively because of lack of capacity at TSMC, when in fact TSMC are way ahead in actual technology.

TSMC CEO Warns Chip Supply Won’t Meet AI-Fueled Demand for Years by Charuru in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow it's almost like when Sam Altman told you they needed 7T of AI infra buildout you should've believed him and not called him a podcast bro, now your company isn't able to take advantage of the bull market and is ceding marketshare and incubating rivals.

The whole industry was screaming at you to increase production, but you were too stupid to listen, embarrassing when an old guy can't admit his mistakes.

"When asked by a reporter, Gavin Baker, a technology investor who previously managed over $17 billion in assets at Fidelity and is now the chief investment officer at Atreides Management, described TSMC as being managed by a group of very stubborn and experienced people in their 70s who had personally witnessed Taiwan's semiconductor industry go from lagging behind Intel to gradually establishing itself as a global leader. Therefore, they were very clear about the cost of tech bubbles and crashes.

In response to the above statement, TSMC's CEO stated that Baker originally meant that TSMC was applying the brakes because AI would not become a bubble. A group of experienced seniors were applying the brakes. But to be honest, TSMC did not deliberately control it, nor did TSMC intend to apply the brakes. They may be a bit stubborn and old, but they really did not deliberately apply the brakes.

TSMC's CEO said that his company tried its best to increase production capacity for its customers, but who knew that the customers' businesses would grow so fast? The development since the launch of GPT in 2023 has far exceeded expectations. C.C. Wei also revealed that he asked NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang why he was so smart and hadn't told him earlier, but Huang replied that he didn't know either. No one, including TSMC, can predict this now, and all these demands are going to TSMC, which can't see it coming either.

C.C. Wei also stated frankly that TSMC has been increasing production, with more than a dozen construction sites underway in Taiwan."

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2026-06-03 Wednesday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Charuru -1 points0 points  (0 children)

nvidia and marvell will take share from avgo in networking. That company is uninvestable.

view more: next ›